• James Harden, Basketball Rorschach Test

    There has never been a basketball player with a bigger delta between the objective reality of his statistical production and the perception of how that production was achieved than James Harden. But before we can dissect whether this dichotomy is justified, it’s important to first look at the cold, hard facts of the matter.

    There is no other way to put it: James Harden’s five-year peak (ongoing this year, of course; unclear for how long it may continue into the future) is some historic shit. In his “worst” year during the stretch (2014-15), he averaged 27.4 ppg/ 5.7 rpg/ 7.0 apg. He has met or exceeded those benchmarks in all three categories every year since, with the exception of last year — his MVP season, as you may recall — in which he “only” collected 5.4 rebounds a night. If you input those ’14-’15 numbers — remember, his worst statistical year of the last five — into Basketball Reference’s Season Finder tool as the parameters and search for total seasons, here’s what you get:

    RkPlayerFromToTmLgCount
    1Oscar Robertson19611968CINNBA8
    2James Harden20152019HOUNBA4
    3LeBron James20082018CLENBA4
    4John Havlicek19711972BOSNBA2
    5Russell Westbrook20152017OKCNBA2
    6Larry Bird19871987BOSNBA1
    7Richie Guerin19621962NYKNBA1
    8Michael Jordan19891989CHINBA1

    That’s it. That’s the list. Only the Big O hit those marks more often than the Beard, and Oscar averaged way more minutes, at a much faster pace, and the competition was much, umm, what’s the word? Oh yeah — whiter.

    Even as he finished second in MVP voting in ’16-’17 (and by all rights should have won with the power of hindsight) and then took home the hardware last year, the first half of this season may be Harden’s statistical opus. He is currently averaging an unprecedented, mind-boggling 33.3/ 5.8/ 8.4, including 4.6 made threes per game, only 13% of which are coming off assists. [For the non-statistically-inclined, this means he shoots a crap-ton of threes off the dribble, and his degree of difficulty is off-the-charts. The eye test backs up this assertion.] Houston’s offense runs through him to a near-comical extent. From a subjective standpoint, I’ve been watching basketball for over 25 years and have never seen a player who shoulders a larger overall offensive burden for his team than Harden does on this iteration of the Rockets. Again, the tape and the analytics shake hands on this: Harden comfortably leads the league in Usage Rate and is second in Assist Rate, meaning he is, paradoxically, both a shoot-first two-guard and a pass-first point guard in the same body.

    He has upped his production to an even more insane degree over the last few weeks, particularly since Chris Paul went out with a hamstring injury, and his heroics have basically saved Houston’s season. The Rockets are 10-1 in their last 11 games, moving all the way up to 4th in the West heading into their showdown with the Warriors Thursday night (10:30 PM ET, TNT). During the stretch, Harden has averaged a scarcely-believable 39.7 ppg/ 6.3 rpg/ 8.4 apg and is attempting 13.4 threes per game. Any way you look at the numbers, Harden is pushing the limits of individual offensive impact to the absolute breaking point, it’s totally working, and yet the collective response from most of the basketball-viewing public ranges from mere indifference to outright disdain. How on Earth did we get here?

    NBA.com

    First, a quick aside. I recently attended a college basketball game with my son, and the group of people sitting directly behind us, to put it charitably, were loud, boorish, and knew next-to-nothing about basketball. Oh well, we drew the short straw, ticket-wise. Whatever. Much to my chagrin, I couldn’t help but overhear their conversations, but at one point, one of the bozos casually asked his friends if any of them had seen Harden’s recent uncalled travel, to which the assembled riff-raff grumbled disapprovingly and expressed the usual anti-NBA sentiments one tends to hear from this class of know-nothings. [I presume he was referring to Harden’s “double step-back,” which is already two weeks old, immediately got meme’d to death within hours on Twitter, and for the record, the NBA promptly admitted the officials got wrong. But I digress.] Harden scored 47 points in the game in question (which the Rockets won by 5 points), and yet literally the ONLY thing that pierced these fans’ bubbles about it — and more broadly, what it says about the NBA as a whole — was the fact he got away with a couple extra steps.

    This is James Harden’s cross to bear. Look, I completely understand why fans (of teams other than the Rockets) would find his game equal parts boring, infuriating, and demoralizing. I certainly experience these emotions as well. The difference is, I am able to compartmentalize these responses, and can begrudgingly appreciate his greatness and understand it is not mutually exclusive from the frustration of watching him grind defenses into dust. There is a large subset of basketball fans who cannot do this. They literally think James Harden is just a gimmick, that he is actually not good at basketball. And it makes me feel like I’m on crazy pills.

    The NBA season is a grind, and if you aren’t following it closely, it’s easy to get lazy and allow the narratives to do the heavy lifting for you, even when those narratives are inaccurate or only explain a small piece of the puzzle. Harden flops, travels, and baits the refs into giving him calls. That’s a simple narrative to digest, and it gives people something to complain about (which, if we’re being honest, at the end of the day is really what most people want). The team’s stylistic choices and Harden’s ability to bend the rules to his advantage (in terms of his gather step, initiating contact on drives, and so forth) acts as a smoke screen for the the stuff going on underneath which allows him to be a historically great offense unto himself. His transgressions are effects, not causes, but people see what they want to see.

    The numbers are there if you care to see them. Yes, Harden shoots a lot of free throws: 11.1 per game this season, hitting at an 85% clip. That’s 9.4 ppg out of his season average of 33.3, meaning he is scoring almost 24 ppg on made FGs alone. He is a supreme shot-maker by any definition, but his ability to manipulate the arms of defenders and occasionally exaggerate contact are seen by many as his main offensive weapons. In practice, these tricks are merely the fondant on his offensive cake, which is baked out of ingredients like strength, quickness, court vision, and balance. His style is seen as boring and/or selfish, but it is simply the logical endpoint of team offensive philosophy when you have a player with his skill set. He puts an unbelievable amount of pressure on every level of a defense, whether it’s the quickness to beat his man at the point of attack, the strength to finish over length (or get fouled) in the paint, and the basketball IQ to sense the collapsing defense and kick out to a shooter for an open 3. You may not like the way he plays, but the harsh reality is if you are looking for a quality shot, there is virtually no better NBA offense than handing James Harden the ball, flanking him with shooters, and letting him go to work.

    Simply put, almost any team would be foolish not to run the “Harden Offense” if they had a player who could do the things Harden can do. What he does is not a gimmick, no matter how much we might want it to be for our own entertainment preferences. The guy is an arbitrary statistical quirk away from being a two-time defending MVP, and after his latest torrid stretch of play and Houston’s rise up the standings, most betting markets now have this year’s award as essentially a two-man race between Harden and Giannis Antetokounmpo. You can dislike his greatness until you’re blue in the (bearded) face, but trying to deny it exists is a losing argument.

    Whether it is incumbent on the NBA to legislate out the more nefarious parts of Harden’s game is an entirely different question, and in my opinion is more of an argument FOR Harden’s greatness rather than a refutation of it. They sure as hell don’t change the rules for the Wesley Johnsons and Bismack Biyombos of the world. The Rockets’ only obligation is to do what wins games, but the league faces a trickier balance: the NBA, more so than any other professional league, has long understood the success of the enterprise as a whole is tied to both the competitive nature (and balance) of the sport and the entertainment value of the product. With the season so long and the margins so thin, teams are naturally willing to exploit any competitive advantage they can find, and the league is often required to be flexible in finding solutions which hew to both the spirit of the game they are looking to maintain AND help increase the profitability and accessibility of the on-court product. Sometimes they get it wrong, and either way they take a ton of shit for whatever they change, but overall the league does a good job of tailoring the rules to the evolving athletic and strategic realities of the game.

    Is the way Harden bends the rules to their breaking point (and occasionally beyond) worthy of legislation? Again, it’s all in the eye of the beholder. The league has repeatedly reviewed Harden’s step-back move and deemed it conforms to the current interpretation of legal footwork. Changing the way gather steps are officiated simply to negate the efficacy of this one move would have a ton of unintended downstream effects, many of which might change the appearance of the game in ways fans may not appreciate. Others have suggested the league make it an offensive foul to initiate contact by “trapping” the defender’s arm on a drive, another common Harden tactic. Problem is, it takes two to tango, and defenders would simply flip the script and try to draw calls by purposely getting their arms caught. This would only serve to create a different sort of gray area for officials to negotiate, rather than solving the underlying problem, if in fact one exists.

    One thing I do think the league could do is legislate out the “hand in the cookie jar” fouls, where ball handlers feel contact from the trailing defender in the pick-and-roll and then fire up a three simply to draw a shooting foul. Harden does this *all the time* (he has drawn by far the most three-point shooting fouls in the league over the last several seasons, often by employing this move) and it’s not really a basketball play. The way I see it, it’s basically an extension of the “rip through” maneuver the league legislated out a few years ago, and no one complains about that change, so it could be a small tweak worth trying rather than doing anything drastic.

    Harden’s “plight” is symptomatic of the way fans interface with NBA superstars in the modern era. In most areas of life, we encourage victory by any means necessary (many job postings list a “whatever it takes attitude” as a prerequisite for employment, setting aside entirely whether this is actually a positive trait for a well-adjusted human being to possess), but when it comes to transcendent basketball talents, for some reason we move the goalposts and demand they win according to terms we arbitrarily set and change without notice. [Cut to LeBron James and Kevin Durant nodding vigorously.] If Harden didn’t take advantage of all the tools at his disposal and was a correspondingly less effective player as a result, everyone would just bitch at him for that, so what is he supposed to do?

    Harden’s success has undeniably changed the boundaries of the sport and the way we think about what we want the game to be. That is its own form of greatness, whether you enjoy the physical manifestation of it or not. Even if you don’t, history is going to make you eat crow anyway: Basketball Reference estimates Harden’s current Hall of Fame chances at 98.5%, so he could hang up his beard tomorrow and we’d still have to have this talk again three years from now. So perhaps it’s time to shift the conversation from what the league needs to do to slow down Harden to what opposing defenses need to do. If it turns out there is no defensive counter to limit his offensive production, and the answers are “hope Daryl Morey doesn’t put the right players around him” and “just wait it out until he gets old and declines,” then we’ll have no choice but to admit we’re dealing with an all-timer and channel our inner Wes Mantooth:

    Top Photo Credit: Slam

  • Blind resumes are all the rage these days, so let’s hop on the bandwagon. Here are the per-game stats of four prominent NBA point guards in their respective second seasons in the league:

    AgeMPFGAFG%3PA3P%2PA2P%eFG%FTAFT%TRBASTSTLBLKTOVPTS
    2131.913.6.4683.1.39310.6.489.5125.7.7223.67.71.70.63.118.0
    2136.813.6.4372.2.35011.4.455.4665.6.8184.48.91.80.02.517.3
    2136.213.5.4230.6.07112.9.440.4246.1.7894.58.01.40.93.916.3
    2134.314.1.4181.3.22112.9.438.4285.1.7804.98.01.30.43.316.1

    Here is the same chart, adjusted to per-100 possessions to control for differences in minutes and pace:

    AgeMPFGAFG%3PA3P%2PA2P%FTAFT%TRBASTSTLBLKTOVPTSORtgDRtg
    21111519.7.4684.4.39315.3.4898.2.7225.311.22.40.84.526.1111112
    21235319.7.4373.2.35016.5.4558.1.8186.312.92.70.13.625.0116106
    21238619.4.4230.9.07118.5.4408.7.7896.511.52.11.25.523.4100107
    21281321.3.4181.9.22119.4.4387.7.7807.412.02.00.64.924.2105106

    Now, if you were an NBA GM and had to choose a point guard to build your franchise around going forward with no other information to go on besides these two tables, which one would you choose?

    Let’s call them Players A, B, C, and D. Just to be clear, this is not a trick question — you can’t really go wrong. Between them, the four players have been selected to 21 All-Star Games and 16 All-NBA teams. Without knowing anything else, most GMs would probably choose Player B, and it would be a wise choice: Player B is the Point God, Chris Paul. Most would probably shy away from Player C, and even with some of the shine coming off his star lately, we’re still talking about a 5-time All-Star in John Wall. So that’s the range.

    The second GM to choose would face a difficult decision between Players A and D. Player D looks to have a slightly better floor game and is perhaps superior defensively (though it would be hard to tell based on how noisy individual defensive stats can be), but Player A appears to be a more efficient offensive option, which would be hard for most GMs to pass up. You could certainly make a compelling case for either one, which is interesting because Player D is Russell Westbrook, and Player A?

    De’Aaron Fox.

    Let that sink in for a moment. We tend to write the book on these highly-touted prospects way too quickly, especially if they disappoint us early on in any way. In Fox’s case, he shot up draft boards after some spectacular performances as a freshman at Kentucky, in particular when he dropped 39 points and eviscerated Lonzo Ball in a Sweet 16 victory over UCLA. When Kentucky lost to UNC in the Elite Eight, it was reported Fox (and fellow one-and-done Malik Monk) were seen sobbing uncontrollably in the locker room afterward, in spite of (or perhaps because of) the knowledge they were both on their way to untold NBA riches. [Contrast this with the attitude of, say, DeAndre Ayton, the 2018 no. 1 overall pick, who put up an unforgivable stink bomb of an effort in his lone NCAA Tournament game vs. SUNY Freaking Buffalo, and then announced he would go pro IN THE LOCKER ROOM IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE GAME.] Even with these pieces of evidence staring us all in the face, we debated endlessly before the draft about whether the best NBA point guard in the class would be Lonzo Ball… or Markelle Fultz.

    Fox was drafted fifth overall in 2017 by the perennially crap-tastic Kings, and his narrative began to be written for him. Despite his blazing speed, eye-popping athleticism, fiery competitiveness, and genius-level feel for the game, De’Aaron was knocked by scouts for his shaky outside shot and wiry build, and it was thought going to such a dysfunctional organization in Sacramento would more or less put the brakes on his career before it ever got started. The narrative was cemented further when Fox struggled out of the gate in his rookie season. He shot poorly from virtually everywhere on the floor, validating concerns about his shot mechanics and his ability to handle NBA length and physicality. He rated as not just a below-average player as a rookie, but a sub-replacement level one, and the whispers that the Kings had burned another lottery pick on a bust grew a little louder.

    What the haters did not count on was Fox’s maniacal competitiveness and desire to improve his game. He has come back in his sophomore season a totally different player. The numbers above speak for themselves, and handing him the reins to the offense in Sacramento has been the key to unlocking their fast-paced, spread-out style (2nd in pace, 5th in per-game scoring, 3rd in 3P%). The Kings have ridden this offensive wave to a surprising 19-16 record, good for 8th in the ever-changing Western Conference standings. Fox’s shooting has improved from every level of the floor, and in particular from deep, where he is up to 39.3% (vs. 30.7% last year) on 3.1 attempts per game. This massive jump in efficiency from the perimeter has created the defensive gravity to allow his previously suffocated drive-and-kick game the necessary breathing room which, along with the concurrent improvement of sharpshooter Buddy Hield — as well as the addition of veteran stretch-4 Nemanja Bjelica — have all contributed to the quantum leaps in Fox’s scoring and assists.

    The guy’s speed and athleticism pop off the screen at various times during a game. It’s impossible not to draw the comparisons to Wall and Westbrook when you see a 6’3″ guy do stuff like this:

    Or this:

    Or, umm, THIS:

    Fox just became legally able to buy a beer about a week ago, so we are still years away from his peak, and there are naturally a number of things for him to improve about his game. The Kings’ organizational mandate to push the pace probably contributes to Fox’s weak-looking individual defensive metrics, and expecting him to live up to CP3’s defensive reputation (an unfathomable NINE All-Defense selections) is unreasonable, but a player with De’Aaron’s combination of length, quickness, mental acumen, and commitment to improve should eventually turn into a borderline elite defender, or at the very least, a well-above-average one. In accordance with league-wide trends, he’ll need to continue to work on his pull-up game to become a lethal go-to scorer in crunch time scenarios. The organization hopes he can develop a seamless pick-and-roll/pop chemistry with 2018 no. 2 overall pick Marvin Bagley III, as the interconnected ceilings of the duo will ultimately determine whether this version of the Kings tops out as a contender or just an also-ran.

    There will be kinks to work out and growing pains to endure. None of the hurdles feel too high for De’Aaron to clear. For the first time in a great many moons, the future of the Kings looks bright, and it starts with the All-NBA potential of Fox.

    As for those other three sophomore point guards we discussed earlier? Paul and Westbrook each made their first All-Star team in their third season, while Wall suffered injuries and didn’t get there until his fourth. So if Fox is pushing the West’s elite PGs for a spot on the roster next year, don’t say I didn’t warn you. And oh yeah, over this year plus the next four, the trio will earn a combined $554 million, so chances are Fox will end up pretty well compensated for his efforts, too. Way to go, youngblood.

    Top Photo Credit: Sky Sports

  • Season’s Greetings!

    I am admittedly not the biggest “Christmas spirit” kind of guy, but there are two things about the holiday which excite me:

    1. It’s one of the only days of the year where it’s perfectly acceptable for an adult to wear pajamas pretty much all day; and

    2. Thirteen straight hours of guilt-free NBA basketball.

    The main story lines of the day are pretty well-worn among us die-hards by now: Giannis is a freak, LeBron vs. the Warriors, Harden vs. Westbrook, the Boston-Philly rivalry is back, and so on. These narratives are gracious plenty for the throngs of casual fans who probably watch more NBA ball on Christmas Day than they do the rest of the season put together. But for us nerds, it’s nice to get a little something extra beyond the big, flashy gifts under the tree, so today we’ll be looking at the stocking stuffers: the little, novel accents to watch for tomorrow that will help round out your holiday viewing experience.

    Let’s start with the matinee:

    Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports

    MILWAUKEE BUCKS AT NEW YORK KNICKS, 12 PM ET

    Milwaukee’s Goofy-but-Effective Depth: Sure, Toronto has the better record (on account of having three more wins already in the bank) and Golden State’s Death Star is not yet fully operational, but there is an argument to be made Milwaukee has been the best team in the NBA through the first trimester or so of the season. The Bucks do a TON of things really well: they lead the league in point differential and net rating, are top-5 in both Offensive and Defensive Rating, shoot a ton from beyond the arc (2nd in 3PA) while being incredibly efficient inside of it (1st in 2P%), move the ball (5th in APG), clean the glass (1st in Total RPG), and defend effectively without fouling (1st in both opponents’ FG% allowed and FTA allowed).

    Of course it all starts with Giannis’ alien gifts, but the new front office has done a tremendous job of working around some of the sins of the previous regime to surround the generational talent of the Greek Freak with oddly complementary pieces. Brook Lopez, stretch-5, is the unexpected avatar and  logical conclusion of the pace-and-space revolution. A full 70% of Lopez’s FG attempts come from outside the arc, and he is paradoxically averaging both a career high in Block% and a career low in Rebounding%. He essentially functions as a 7’1″ shooting guard on offense, but his size unlocks the full breadth of Giannis’ defensive versatility and all the kooky lineup combinations head coach Mike Budenholzer can dream up.

    Malcolm Brogdon has transformed himself from Rookie-of-the-Year-by-Default into one of the league’s most efficient marksmen, with a scarcely believable 50/45/98 shooting split as a fourth option (alongside Giannis’ slightly higher-usage wingmen Khris Middleton and Eric Bledsoe). Brogdon is the perfect lineup spackle, switching seamlessly over three positions on both ends, protecting the ball, spacing the floor, and consistently making correct decisions. The bench is an island of misfit toys, but it works because their strengths (primarily some combination of outside shooting and defensive versatility) work well when paired with one or more of the primary creators from the first unit. Tony Snell, Ersan Ilyasova, and Pat Connaughton are limited players who don’t move the needle outside of this particular ecosystem, but their catch-and-shoot gravity as floor spacers opens up driving lanes for Giannis, and the whole thing becomes one vicious cycle. They’ve held on to enough draft picks to take swings on young guys Thon Maker, Donte DiVincenzo, D.J. Wilson, and Sterling Brown, all of whom have shown some promise in limited minutes. Recent addition George Hill remains a steady caretaker, even as he is clearly well into the back nine of his career and grossly overpaid.

    Giannis remains the straw that stirs the drink in terms of the innovative, five-out offensive scheme and versatile defensive lineup combinations, but what we’re seeing in Milwaukee is tip-of-the-spear, avant garde basketball, and it’s working. Coach Bud and the gaggle of strange role players they’ve assembled deserve some shine beyond just basking in Giannis’ enormous glow.

    OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER AT HOUSTON ROCKETS, 3 PM ET

    Steven Adams, Hidden Superstar: For all the get-off-my-lawners out there who insist the game has gone soft and all the physical, interior big men have been hunted into extinction, I give you my beloved Dothraki son, Steven Adams. The 25-year-old Kiwi bruiser was rightly seen as a project when he was drafted out of the University of Pittsburgh in 2013, and despite the league’s stylistic changes over that time, Adams has continued to hone his craft, increasing his scoring and rebounding averages every season in the league while virtually never shooting the ball from outside of ten feet.

    Now averaging 16-and-10 on 59% shooting for a 21-11 OKC team sitting pretty at 3rd in the West after an 0-4 start which feels like it was years ago, Adams has evolved into the perfect third option behind dark horse MVP candidate Paul George and noted triple-double hunter Russell Westbrook. He’s the last line of defense for the league’s 2nd-ranked outfit, a tenacious rebounder on both ends of the floor, and a brutal screen-setter and lob-crammer who also possesses surprising touch, footwork, and playmaking instincts on the offensive end. He’s clever and quick-witted with the media, and would absolutely be a high pick on the All-Dark Alley Team, AKA The Charles Oakley All-Stars. I just love everything about the guy, and you should too.

    Sporting News

    PHILADELPHIA 76ERS AT BOSTON CELTICS, 5:30 PM ET

    Are the Celtics in Trouble Without…*adjusts glasses*…*squints*…Aron Baynes??: It’s a 2-for-1 today on takes about hulking, hirsute, Australasian centers who impact winning beyond their statistical production. Thirty-two-year-old Australian and man-bun enthusiast Aron Baynes is expected to miss 4-6 weeks after surgery to repair a broken bone in his left hand he suffered Wednesday in Boston’s puzzling loss to Phoenix. The loss of a backup center averaging 14.2 minutes and 5.5 points a night wouldn’t normally register as a crisis — particularly for a squad as deep as the Celtics — but both visually and statistically, Baynes seems to act as a sort of bellwether for this Boston team. When he plays 15+ minutes, the Celtics are 9-3. In all other games, including seven in which Baynes didn’t play, they are 10-10. The team is +11.3 points per 100 possessions when Baynes is on the floor, up from +4.6 without him. From an “eye test” standpoint, they just look more complete when he’s out there. Besides Horford (who Baynes primarily backs up anyway), they have few other guys on their ultra-talented roster who take pride in the grunt work — screening, blocking out, defending the post, and taking the occasional hard-but-necessary foul.

    His absence may be felt heavily in the upcoming stretch of games, particularly given their opponent on Christmas. Horford and Baynes have combined to frustrate Sixers’ MVP candidate Joel Embiid in their meetings over the last two seasons, and with Baynes out and Horford just returning from a leg injury which cost him seven games, Embiid could have a field day against Boston’s undersized and undermanned frontcourt. Boston head coach Brad Stevens may have to go deeper into his bench, giving additional minutes to both Daniel Theis and Robert “Timelord” Williams. Theis is another competent pro who always gives high-effort minutes, but he lacks the size to keep Embiid from getting to the rim, and Williams, for all of the explosiveness he has shown in limited minutes thus far, remains a raw rookie with A LOT to learn about the NBA game. Stevens could try shifting Marcus Morris up to the 5 for stretches or giving some run to Guerschon Yabusele, though these units would likely hemorrhage points on defense, offsetting any gains realized on the offensive end. Either way, Embiid must be salivating at the opportunity to catch the Celtics’ frontcourt at less than full strength, so watch for him to come out aggressively in the early going tomorrow and try to get Horford in foul trouble.

    Jose Carlos Fajardo/Bay Area News Group

    LOS ANGELES LAKERS AT GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS, 8 PM ET

    Should Defenses Ignore Draymond Green?: Draymond’s ability to put the ball in the basket appears to have completely abandoned him this season. In 31.0 minutes a night, he is attempting only 6.9 shots, scoring 7.3 points (easily his lowest since he became a full-time starter in 2014-15), and shooting a ghastly 23.9% from downtown. It hasn’t particularly slowed the champs down, as they’ve climbed back into their perch atop the West on the backs of three pretty good scorers you may have heard about. For his part, Green has expressed his usual self-confidence despite the prolonged slump, and his floor game remains as robust as ever (8.0 RPG, 6.7 APG, 1.8 SPG, 0.9 BPG), but for teams still searching for any weakness to exploit against the Dubs, giving Dray the Ben Wallace treatment unless and until he proves he deserves to be guarded again may be a sound strategy. Opposing defenses have typically been happy to concede open looks to Draymond as a release valve in lieu of the far worse alternatives Golden State’s machine presents, but it could be time to take things to the logical extreme. It would only add to the intrigue if the one to deploy the semi-disrespectful game plan were Lakers’ head coach (and erstwhile Warriors’ assistant coach/interim head coach) Luke Walton. Whether Dray goes 1-for-12 from deep in a loss, or he cans six triples and the Dubs run LA out of the gym, if nothing else, the post-game interviews would be appointment viewing.

    PORTLAND TRAIL BLAZERS AT UTAH JAZZ, 10:30 PM ET

    Can Utah Make the West Even More Crowded?: If you’ve made it through all the games up until this point, you will likely be delirious, so don’t think too deeply about the nightcap between an offensive-minded team who is probably not as good as its record (Portland) and a defensive-minded team who is probably better than its record (Utah). Enjoy the first quarter or so, fall into a deep, pleasant, eggnog-induced slumber, then wake up in the morning and check to see if a Utah win turned the West standings into even more of a clusterf*ck than they already were going into the day. You will have earned your shut-eye, intrepid NBA viewer.

    Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and thanks for reading!

    Top Photo Credit: Layne Murdoch via NBAE/Getty Images

  • I love a spirited NBA debate as much as anyone on the planet, but there is one point on which you will never convince me otherwise: in terms of the level of overall talent, the league has never been in a better place than it is right now.

    Historically, eras are defined by the stars, and the pace-and-space era has no shortage of those, but one of the defining characteristics of the modern game has been the depth of talent throughout the league and how it has raised the overall level of play from possession to possession. We’ve seen pace, scoring, and offensive efficiency rise steadily over the last half-decade, for various reasons, but for all the explanations we can proffer, it’s hard to argue with the idea that the quality of play has improved, in part, because on average, each player is simply able to discharge his role and responsibilities at a higher level than in years past.

    The NBA truism is depth is less important in the postseason as rotations shrink and stars take on added importance, and for the most part the theory holds water. But in the regular season, the evidence is mounting that depth is king. Take Denver, for example. The Nugs are currently atop the West and have won ten of their last twelve games, despite having an injury report which by itself would probably be the 6-seed in the East. The Clippers, Mavs, and Kings have also outperformed expectations owing largely to strong bench units.

    In the East, most of the top squads have also gone the “spread the wealth” route. Toronto is the most obvious example, despite their recent three-game slide. They not only have a center-by-committee approach to the starting lineup — allowing head coach Nick Nurse to deploy Serge Ibaka, Jonas Valanciunas, or both as the matchups dictate — but they go 11-12 deep with productive NBA players, which has enabled MVP candidate Kawhi Leonard to rest on one leg of back-to-backs as he continues to recover from last season’s mysterious quad injury without the team missing a beat. Milwaukee, Boston, and Indiana have similarly surrounded their singular stars with a cornucopia of complementary talent.

    This explosion of bench productivity has led to one of the deepest and most interesting Sixth Man of the Year races we’ve seen, perhaps ever, and it’s the focus of our breakdown today. I’ve identified a mind-boggling fourteen players with a legitimate claim to the award. The NBA’s only criteria for eligibility is the player comes off the bench more often than he starts, so we’ll stick with that, even though a few of these guys have either already moved into the starting lineup or may do so at some point, meaning they could eventually end up out of the running. To account for differences in minutes and try to get an apples-to-apples comparison of production, the stats you’ll see below are all per-36 minutes unless otherwise noted. I’ve broken the candidates down into three distinct tiers, so let’s get started.

    [Stats courtesy of Basketball-Reference.com unless otherwise noted.]

    TIER ONE: HONORABLE MENTIONS

    PlayerAgeGGSFGAFG%3PA3P%2PA2P%FTAFT%TRBASTSTLBLKTOVPTS
    Marvin Bagley1926014.0.5361.6.34612.4.5606.2.6839.51.40.71.62.619.8
    Josh Hart23311010.5.4306.4.3714.1.5221.9.6434.61.61.50.91.112.6
    Monte Morris2330112.4.4843.6.4538.7.4971.3.7784.05.91.40.11.014.6

    MARVIN BAGLEY III, SACRAMENTO KINGS: Despite the Kings’ surprising start, Bagley has been viewed in some circles as a disappointment, but it really only holds true vis-a-vis Slovenian wunderkind Luka Doncic, whom Sacramento passed up to select Bagley at no.2 overall. In a universe where Luka (and to a lesser extent, DeAndre Ayton and Jaren Jackson, Jr.) didn’t exist, Bagley would be heavy in the running for Rookie of the Year, but instead, his contributions off the Kings’ bench (veteran Nemanja Bjelica has drawn every start at the 4 due to his superior floor-spacing ability) put him in the conversation here. He’s shooting almost 54% from the field despite the fact he goes to his left every single time and every defender knows it, and putting up nearly 20-and-10 on a per-36 basis. That’s pretty damn good for a 19-year-old! His defense and outside stroke still need work — even as both have been a tad better than advertised — and head coach Dave Joerger’s recent “Durant and Westbrook” comments (with regards to Bagley and ascendant second-year point guard De’Aaron Fox) don’t really help to frame the expectations properly, but the future remains bright for Bagley and the Kings. [Yes, that feels incredibly weird to say.]

    JOSH HART, LOS ANGELES LAKERS: Hart’s stats look underwhelming, but he has been one of the most important factors in the Lakers moving beyond their getting-to-know-you phase and transitioning into a real threat in the West. His catch-and-shoot ability and defensive versatility make him both a great fit next to LeBron and Grade A lineup spackle, which probably explains why he has taken over the starting SG role for LA and is unlikely to relinquish it any time soon. Either way, he still warrants a mention.

    MONTE MORRIS, DENVER NUGGETS: Morris was a guy I had my eye on out of college at Iowa State. He was a 4-year senior and never wowed anyone with his length or athleticism (hence why he was drafted at no. 51 by Denver in 2017), but every time I watched him, he just knew what he was doing. He always seemed to be under control, making correct decisions, and getting to his spots in a way that was underappreciated because the talent around him couldn’t quite make proper use of his skills. Morris didn’t get an opportunity in his rookie season, but with the rash of injuries Denver has suffered early this year, he has been thrust into the spotlight earlier than expected and thrived in his new role. He shoots when he should — and at elite percentages — keeps the ball moving, and hardly ever turns it over (currently 9th in the league in turnover percentage). He has become a calming influence on Denver’s youthful roster, and has caught the attention of the veterans and coaching staff alike. Guys like Morris hide in plain sight in the draft every year — Jalen Brunson, anyone? — and teams continue to overlook them. The moral of the story, as always: NBA teams are dumb. Anyway, it’s a shame a dude this good might not even crack the top-10 in the voting.

    NBA.com

    TIER TWO: ANY OTHER YEAR…

    PlayerAgeGGSFGAFG%3PA3P%2PA2P%FTAFT%TRBASTSTLBLKTOVPTS
    J.J. Barea3426019.0.4385.8.29613.2.5003.8.7174.610.01.10.13.121.1
    Marcus Morris29281114.4.4926.8.4247.6.5533.0.8758.22.00.80.21.919.8
    Terrence Ross2730016.3.4527.5.4008.8.4972.1.8443.82.31.30.61.619.6
    Fred VanVleet2428712.5.4126.2.3586.3.4632.0.7693.46.31.40.31.914.0
    Lou Williams3226019.9.3985.1.34414.8.4167.4.9413.76.40.80.13.424.6

    J.J. BAREA, DALLAS MAVERICKS: It is unclear if the passage of time applies to Barea in the same fashion it does to the rest of us mere mortals. He appears to be getting better with age — at 34 years old and listed at a generous 6’0″, Father Time should be having his way by now — and it certainly looks as though he could still be schooling punks in the pick-and-roll well into his mid-40’s if he were so inclined. His outside shooting is down so far and he remains the same defensive liability he’s always been, but offensively he’s aging like a fine wine, with career highs in PER, Win Shares per 48, Assist Percentage, and Usage Rate. He always seems to get some passing consideration in the Sixth Man race, and it speaks to the depth of this year’s class that he won’t sniff the award despite having the best season of his career.

    MARCUS MORRIS, BOSTON CELTICS: Like Hart, Morris will probably fall out of the running eventually, as he has started the last 11 games for the suddenly-surging Celtics. In any case, he has been a breath of fresh air offensively for a team which has badly needed it, scoring with an efficiency we’ve never seen from him before (career highs in FG%, 3P%, FT%, PER, WS/48, eFG%, and TS%), so he deserves some love. And because the NBA isn’t weird at all, right around the time Marcus was moved into Boston’s starting lineup, his twin brother, Markieff, was re-energized by his move to the bench unit for Washington and could easily replace his brother in this conversation as the season progresses.

    TERRENCE ROSS, ORLANDO MAGIC: An excellent example of my “depth of talent” argument from the intro. After being drafted 8th overall by Toronto in 2012, some might consider Ross’ career up until now a disappointment, which is both fair and unfair at once. He’s not a star and he never will be, so it could be argued he was a “waste” of the 8th pick, though if you recall from my Draft Slot NBA column, the 8th pick hasn’t exactly been a hotbed of talent over the last fifteen years. At the same time, Ross is what he is, which is useful: an athletic, versatile bench wing who can hit open shots and keep the ball moving without using a ton of possessions, turning it over, or costing his team much defensively, and at a reasonable-yet-tradeable cap figure. Teams need those guys! He won’t win the award, and it’s a shame he’s burning up his prime years for this lame Orlando franchise which can’t ever seem to figure out what it wants to be, but he still deserves some shine for his career year.

    FRED VANVLEET, TORONTO RAPTORS: Like Monte Morris and Josh Hart above, VanVleet was also overlooked in the draft, and the stat sheet vastly undersells his impact on a winning team. He doesn’t do any one thing incredibly well, but he’s tough, smart, versatile, and consistently gives positive minutes to one of the league’s best and deepest bench units. He would represent an upgrade at the starting point guard spot for a number of teams. [As would Delon Wright, honestly; that’s how freaking stacked Toronto is.]

    LOU WILLIAMS, LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS: Sweet Lou has seen a noticeable dip in minutes and shooting efficiency this season after he cruised to the Sixth Man award last season, but he remains one of the league’s elite microwave players. When dissecting how much of an outlier the ’18-’19 race is however, it’s more telling to look at Lou’s other Sixth Man victory, back in 2014-15. That year, playing for Toronto, Williams took home the hardware with per-36 numbers of 22.2/ 2.7/ 2.9 on 40/34/86 shooting, and the Raptors weren’t a particularly dominant team, winning 49 games. Efficiency has never been Lou’s calling card — and his defense has been equally shoddy throughout his career —  but seriously, would that stat line even get him in the top-10 this year? [Yeah, yeah, don’t talk to me about pace. He enjoys about four extra possessions per game compared to that Toronto team — minutes are identical, oddly enough — and he’s scoring 2.2 more ppg and dishing 2.4 more apg this season. If somebody could average that every four possessions, he’d be the greatest player the game’s ever seen and it wouldn’t be close.]

    Derick E. Hingle-USA TODAY Sports

    TIER THREE: THE CONTENDERS

    PlayerAgeGGSFGAFG%3PA3P%2PA2P%FTAFT%TRBASTSTLBLKTOVPTS
    Spencer Dinwiddie2533315.2.4796.7.3718.4.5656.1.7843.36.20.80.42.721.8
    Montrezl Harrell2530013.0.6280.1.50012.9.6298.4.6129.42.31.22.11.921.5
    Julius Randle24311116.8.5532.3.32714.5.5888.1.70612.33.60.80.83.225.0
    Derrick Rose3029818.2.4934.0.46914.2.5003.9.8393.55.70.80.32.223.1
    Domantas Sabonis2230113.1.6220.3.83312.8.6175.3.75014.44.40.80.83.620.5
    Dennis Schroder2529918.0.4245.1.33912.9.4573.9.8595.05.81.30.23.520.3

    SPENCER DINWIDDIE, BROOKLYN NETS: I was originally going to relegate Dinwiddie to Tier Two in deference to two-time winner (and reigning 6MOY) Lou Williams, but after his recent torrid stretch — combined with the Clippers’ current skid — Spencer gets the nod. In any case, Dinwiddie has been terrific. He was forced into a starting role for much of last season and showed off his playmaking chops as the lead distributor (9th in the league in Assist%) for an injured, cruddy Nets team. This year, with starter D’Angelo Russell healthy and showing some signs at long last, Dinwiddie has been able to come off the bench and display his scoring ability (17.5 ppg on 48/37/78 shooting in 28.8 minutes a night), including 24 ppg during the Nets’ improbable seven-game active win streak. He was recently rewarded with a 3-year/$34 million extension and has been a huge part of Brooklyn creeping back towards .500, just a half-game out of the eighth spot in the East. He’ll remain in the thick of the race if he and the team can continue their ascent,  but as good as he’s been, it’s tough to envision him surpassing all of the names we’re about to discuss.

    DENNIS SCHRODER, OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER: He’s a tad overpaid, and his warts as a player are the same as they ever were in Atlanta, but for a sixth man, boy, you could do a lot worse. Sure, he’s padded his overall numbers a bit doing his best Westbrook impersonation during the games Brodie has missed with injury (18.1/ 5.3/ 5.7 in 33 mpg over 9 games as a starter this year), but he’s been impactful as the engine of the second unit and alongside Russ in dual-point guard looks as well. Any measure of delta on the scoreboard you want to use — plus/minus, on/off, net rating — all paint him as terrific. OKC has gone 20-6 since their cold-shooting 0-4 start, and they are 1st in Defensive Rating and 5th in Net Rating, so team success could certainly buoy his candidacy to a degree. It still probably won’t be enough to put him over the top, however, given all the other mouths to feed in the OKC pecking order and the rest of the contenders.

    DERRICK ROSE, MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES: So perhaps I was a tad hasty in saying D-Rose should hang ’em up. Amazingly, the former MVP has found second (third? fourth? FIF?) life as an ultra-efficient bench spark plug, including an unsustainable 47% from downtown on 3.3 attempts per game. Whether or not the regression monster is coming for him, there was simply no way to predict this type of career renaissance based on how cooked he appeared the last couple seasons, especially last year. Did he fly to Germany to get the secret Kobe knee treatment in the offseason? We may never know. Regardless, and however you feel about Rose personally, good on him for not giving up and rediscovering his form by evolving as a player.

    MONTREZL HARRELL, LOS ANGELES CLIPPERS: Harrell and the next guy on the list are essentially carbon copies of each other: per-minute and advanced metric monsters who have inarguably outplayed the more-heralded big men starting in front of them with a combination of effort, energy, and efficiency. Harrell pops off the screen when you watch him because he just plays so damn hard at all times, attacking the rim and drawing fouls with an almost unsettling ferocity. His minutes and productivity have both slipped during the Clips’ recent swoon (1-6 in their last seven games), but if he can return to form and overtake some of Marcin Gortat’s minutes, his numbers may end up being too gaudy for voters to overlook.

    DOMANTAS SABONIS, INDIANA PACERS: Again, choosing between Harrell and Sabonis involves picking serious nits, but I’ll give Domas the edge based on his superior rebounding, scoring efficiency, and the overall polish of his game at a younger age. After being misused as a stretch-4 in OKC, Sabonis has found his niche on the interior in Indiana, and his impact on the surging Pacers has been enormous. He possesses the sky-high basketball IQ and playmaking instincts one would expect from the son of legendary big man Arvydas Sabonis, and he makes up for middling athleticism with exquisite positioning and a motor that never stops revving. This is somewhat anecdotal, and it’s unclear if his rate stats would hold up in a larger role, but when I watch Domas play, it feels like he’s always making plus plays, and it is impossible to forget he’s on the floor.

    The front office will need to determine if Sabonis can fit long-term alongside recently extended big man Myles Turner (4-years/$72 million kicking in next season) in a twin towers-style lineup. Their minutes have mostly been staggered to this point (Sabonis has played only 167 of his 740 minutes with Turner in the lineup, and the two have a slight negative point differential in those minutes), which is untenable over the long haul for two core players. Turner may have already gotten his payday and is probably still the superior defensive player, but if Sabonis continues to improve and produce like an All-Star, it will be nearly impossible to convince fans and ownership he shouldn’t have a larger role on the team. In the meantime, let’s not forget how the Pacers got pilloried for the return in the Paul George trade, and less than 18 months later, that return includes an All-Star and Most Improved Player in Victor Oladipo and a superstar role player, possible future All-Star, and strong candidate for Sixth Man of the Year in Sabonis. Always remember: the collective NBA hive-mind knows nothing.

    Sabonis has been fantastic, but I still can’t put him ahead of…

    JULIUS RANDLE, NEW ORLEANS PELICANS: My choice for the award as 2018 winds down is another guy who is only a bench player by virtue of the positional logjam at the 4 in New Orleans. On most teams, a player as skilled as Randle would certainly be a starter, but the presence of Nikola Mirotic (and his cleaner fit alongside Anthony Davis in the starting lineup) has pushed the bulldozing former Kentucky big man to the second unit, where he has produced far beyond anyone else in the league. Randle has yet to develop an outside shot, but he does virtually everything else well offensively: an elite scorer in the restricted area (72% FG percentage), gets to the free throw line (8.1 attempts per-36 minutes, a career high), and very effective as both a scorer and distributor in transition. If his defense ever catches up with his offense, look out. The presence of Mirotic, along with the ’19-’20 player option in Randle’s below-market contract which he will almost certainly decline to become a free agent, have fueled speculation New Orleans might look to deal Randle prior to the trade deadline as part of a package to provide reinforcements for Anthony Davis as his potentially apocalyptic pre/free agency decision approaches in 2020. Any move would likely shift Randle into a starting role — he has already started 11 games, by the way — so it could throw his eligibility for the award into question, but assuming the status quo holds, it’s hard to argue with his credentials. Julius Randle is a bad man, and as things stand today, he should take home the trophy.

    Top Photo Credit: Richard Shotwell/AP

  • The NBA’s imbalance of power between the conferences isn’t about the teams at the top. Sure, the West has Golden State, but after the champs, it could be argued in good faith the East has the league’s next five best teams in Toronto, Milwaukee, Philly, Boston, and Indiana. Rather, the difference in the conferences is most evident in the middle and bottom of the standings. In the West, there are fourteen solid teams competing for eight playoff spots, plus Phoenix. By contrast, the East is much more stratified, with five really good teams, four cover-your-eyes awful teams, and six other squads sandwiched in the middle, throwing rocks at each other all season for the “honor” of being on the receiving end of a first-round walloping. Today, depressing as it may be, let’s climb onto the dreaded treadmill of mediocrity to determine who will emerge victorious from the Eastern Conference slap fight for those final three playoff spots.

    [All records and stats are courtesy of Basketball-Reference.com unless otherwise noted, and are current through Wednesday’s games.]

    BROOKLYN NETS (11-18, 11th in Conference): I almost chose not to include the Nets at all, as 11-18 is not normally the type of record associated with a team hanging around the periphery of the playoff race, but I suppose that’s why we’re here, right? Finally free of their indentured draft servitude to the Celtics, Brooklyn actually approached basic basketball competence to begin the season, going 6-7 over their first 13 games before rising star Caris LeVert suffered a gruesome right foot dislocation against Minnesota, an injury which miraculously turned out to be less catastrophic than it looked. Without their best player, the rudderless squad has been in free fall ever since, going 4-11 including the loss in which the injury occurred. LeVert’s rehab is reportedly progressing more quickly than expected, but it’s hard to imagine he’ll return to the court (and to form) in time to stanch the bleeding, even if the teams around them do little to separate themselves in the meantime.

    Nets’ GM Sean Marks has done yeoman’s work in rebuilding the roster from the ground up following  Billy King’s execrable reign, but the renovation remains far from complete. In addition to snagging LeVert in 2016 in exchange for Thaddeus Young –who had no future value to Brooklyn anyway– Marks has unearthed several useful pieces through late draft picks and unorthodox personnel moves. Taking a flier on D’Angelo Russell for spare parts was exactly the sort of thing a team trapped in draft pick hell should do. DLo has started to show some signs of improvement as a player and a pro, even if he hasn’t been exactly the type of post-hype sleeper Nets’ fans may have been anticipating. He’s still a sieve on defense and an inefficient chucker at times, but for a team without a lot of other consistent offensive threats, 18.1/ 3.9/ 5.9 and 36% from three isn’t a complete disaster.

    Spencer Dinwiddie has been a terrific low-cost find, and all things considered, is probably a superior player to Russell at this point. [Note: Dinwiddie dropped a career-high 39 points in a win over the Sixers on Wednesday night, and then agreed to a 3-year, $34 million extension with Brooklyn on Thursday. Bully for him.] Nondescript sharpshooter Joe Harris (44.9% from downtown on 5.1 attempts per game) has become an integral part of the rotation and is signed to a contract which is both affordable and eminently tradeable. Jarrett Allen and Rondae Hollis-Jefferson are both young, useful role players Marks acquired by sloughing off unnecessary vets to impatient teams willing to part with late-first round picks in exchange for immediate help. The jury is still out on dart throws Dzanan Musa and “Rowdy” Rodions Kurucs, who are the result of picks acquired as the tax Toronto paid for offloading DeMarre Carroll’s onerous contract into Brooklyn’s plentiful cap space. Ed Davis and Shabazz Napier are undeniably useful rotation players signed to bargain-basement deals, and would be far more valuable as contributors on competitive teams with real aspirations and/or depth issues rather than as cost-efficient roster chum in Brooklyn. The Nets’ one big miss is their baffling dedication to Allen Crabbe, who is shooting only 33% (including a double take-inducing 24% from inside the arc) over 26 minutes a night while pocketing an unfathomable total of $37 million between this year and next.

    Even as all these chicken-shit-to-chicken-salad moves paint the picture of a competent front office — which obviously qualifies as a vast improvement over the previous regime — the devastation wrought by the LeVert injury demonstrates just how far this roster is from anything meaningful, and to a degree, what a waste it is to be hoarding all this useful, low-cost talent on a team that isn’t going anywhere. The irony of their situation is they finally have control of their own future draft picks, so in some ways, coming out of the competitive wilderness now is actually against the franchise’s long-term interests. A clean cap sheet combined with a purposeful tank (as opposed to the unintentionally horrific rosters they were saddled with before) might be the healthiest thing for the Nets, but the front office’s ability to exploit market inefficiencies has left the roster just a hair too robust to properly bottom out.

    For this season, they are stuck in a mediocrity Catch-22: even if LeVert can return, they’ll probably be too far back to catch the other suitors for those last three playoff spots, and if he can’t, they still won’t be bad enough to fall behind the gaggle of truly crap-tastic squads (Cleveland, Chicago, Atlanta, and Phoenix) in the “Not Tryin’ for Zion” sweepstakes. The incremental progress is laudable, but given how low the depths were from which they began and the circumstances they’ve endured, a playoff berth still feels like a bridge too far.

    Verdict: OUT

    WASHINGTON WIZARDS (11-17, 10th in Conference): The Wiz have suffered a half-decade’s worth of tumult in this season’s first two months, and it shows no signs of slowing down. In retrospect, we probably should have seen it coming. A locker room already sporting shaky chemistry added the Dwightbola virus, Austin Rivers, and human bad luck charm Jeff Green. Scott Brooks and Ernie Grunfeld might be the worst head coach/GM combo in the league, and John Wall, who has come under some scrutiny lately for his, ahem, lack of hustle, showed up to Team USA practices over the summer looking like an overweight hobo. That things have gone even as “well” as they have this season is a testament to the baseline of talent they bring to bear and the continued evolution of Bradley Beal’s game.

    The team’s deficiencies are manifold. They shoot the three poorly (27th in 3P%) and defend it even worse (29th in 3P% allowed, as admittedly noisy as this can be). They get out-rebounded by an absurd margin. Their frontcourt has gotten a legitimate lift from the promotion of Thomas Bryant to the starting center role, which tells you everything you need to know about how lacking the other options are. Wall is depressingly disengaged on defense, and it often appears the other players take a cue from their supposed “leader.” The Otto Porter problem is real: he has been marginalized to such a degree — and included in so many trade rumors — that he has gone from “third-best player on an Eastern contender” to “possibly toxic asset” faster than the duration of a typical Dwight Howard fart. Even with the team looking slightly more cohesive of late, the locker room could still fracture at any given moment.

    It’s not all doom and gloom. Beal is a young, improving All-Star who would draw a monster package in return if the Wiz decided to pull the rip cord. Grunfeld smartly (two words which almost never go together) acted as the go-between in the recent Bucks-Cavs trade to acquire combo forward Sam Dekker for next-to-nothing. Dekker is a talented player who has yet to receive a real opportunity to thrive, so hopefully Brooks will throw him regular minutes to try and stabilize DC’s woeful frontcourt rotation. In limited minutes, this season’s first round pick, Troy Brown, Jr., has looked the part of a future NBA contributor. He has a bigger body than I anticipated, and his feel, stroke, and athleticism appear made to last. They may also have plucked a diamond in the rough with two-way player Devin Robinson, a long, lanky athlete who I really liked in his college days at Florida. Kelly Oubre continues to take on a larger role and add things to his game, despite how underwhelming he looks through the lenses of both traditional and advanced statistics. There is a universe where the Wiz sink towards the bottom of the standings and all of these youngsters get a chance to develop in a low-pressure environment, but given both the sorry state of the competition outside the East’s elite and Grunfeld’s perpetual inability to think beyond the status quo, it feels like a “blow it up” nerd’s pipe dream.

    The frontcourt is a train wreck, and it’s unclear whether the continued absence of Dwight makes things better or worse. The roster is well past its expiration date as a group, their ceiling appears lower than ever, and a chemistry-induced implosion is always in play, but even with all these caveats, it’s tough to imagine a team with so much more pure talent than the other squads in their orbit falling into the lottery. My confidence in this prognostication couldn’t be much lower, but…

    Verdict: IN

    Credit: Sporting News

    MIAMI HEAT (11-16, 9th in Conference): What a strange team. They do some important things well: 8th in 3P%, 11th in Defensive Rating, and 10th in Rebounding. Problem is, they are so horrendous from inside the arc (30th with a bullet) that it negates their competence from deep (also 30th in total FG%). Their starting center (Hassan Whiteside) has a 22.7 PER and leads the league in both blocks per game and rebounding percentage, yet his contract is an utter albatross, the team is better with him on the bench, and his backup (Bam Adebayo) may be slowly taking his job. The franchise’s cornerstone (Dwyane Wade) is on his farewell tour, yet for some reason is still leading the team in Usage Rate despite how clearly diminished he is. Rodney McGruder plays the second-most minutes per game on the team. They have no signature stars, yet are capped-out to a comical degree. It’s all bizarre.

    The upshot: there is a lot of room for improvement relative to the competition. Goran Dragic and James “Bloodsport” Johnson, two of the team’s most important veterans, have played only 26 out of a possible 52 combined games. Dragic has had nagging injuries and has not played up to his usual standard when in the lineup, while Johnson continues to work his way back to form after offseason sports hernia surgery. Both players are trending toward the back nine of their respective careers but could offer a real boost in the second half if healthy. Adebayo has looked terrific, even if his archetype has become a bit passe in the modern game. Josh Richardson has evolved into an excellent two-way wing, and his contract is one of the very best in the league, although he would be far more efficient in a slightly less featured role. The rotation and hierarchy remain unsettled: eleven different players are averaging over twenty minutes a night, and everyone seems far too willing to defer to D-Wade as he takes his final lap around the league. This would be fine if the team wasn’t interested in being competitive, a la Kobe’s final season with the Lakers in 2016, but it’s a real organizational conundrum for a team vying for a playoff spot. It feels as though Justise Winslow has been written off multiple times already, but he is still just 22 years old and has shown some flashes of late. If he continues to progress, the 3-year/$39 million extension he signed just prior to the regular season could turn into a real bargain for a team stuck in luxury tax hell.

    Head coach Erik Spoelstra is one of the best in the league at maximizing the talent on his roster. If he can get Dragic and Johnson healthy and productive, continue developing the young guns, and gradually convince Wade to take more of a backseat as part of an overall consolidation of the rotation, then it’s not hard to see the outline of a playoff team in South Beach. If nothing else, I trust their overall organizational competence waaaaaay more than our next group, which has to count for something.

    Verdict: IN

    ORLANDO MAGIC (12-15, 8th in Conference): There has been some groundswell for the “Hey, the Magic aren’t THAT bad!” narrative, but upon closer examination of their “surprising” start, it amounts to the soft bigotry of low expectations. This team is not good in any sense other than relative to their recent iterations. Their offense is a slog: 26th in scoring, 27th in Offensive Rating, 26th in pace, and dead-last in free throw rate. They protect the ball (4th-fewest turnovers), but otherwise, they don’t do anything particularly well on the offensive end. Everything revolves around versatile big man Nikola Vucevic who, to his credit, has developed into a legitimate All-Star (and it will be a travesty if he isn’t selected as a reserve this season).

    The team has dropped three straight, including blowouts at the hands of Indiana and Dallas. Six of their fifteen losses have been by 20+ points, not exactly the hallmark of a playoff outfit. As good as Vucevic has been (20.6/ 11.5/ 3.7 with a 26.5 PER on 54/ 40/ 84 shooting splits), he is in the final year of his contract and is nearly guaranteed to leave for greener pastures next summer. Bouncy forward Aaron Gordon signed a lucrative extension prior to the season, but the deal was structured with an unusual descending salary structure. Offering (and accepting) such an eminently tradeable contract suggests neither Gordon nor the Magic are under any illusion about his long-term future with the organization. The next competitive Magic roster is meant to revolve around multi-skilled young bigs Mo Bamba and Jonathan Isaac, but that day remains many moons away. This places the front office in an awkward spot as it pertains to Vooch and Gordon: they find themselves trying to manage (and extract value from) a rapidly closing window, even though said window never actually opened in the first place.

    Calling their guard and wing play “uninspired” is exceedingly generous. Veteran journeyman D.J. Augustin has been easily their most consistent backcourt creator. Evan Fournier remains a competent scorer for whom no opponent bothers to gameplan. Jonathon Simmons and Jerian Grant look to be playing their way out of the league. Terrence Ross is a nice player, but he should be the 8th/9th man on a good team, not wasting away as a good stats/bad team guy. For a team which has been drafting in the lottery for what feels like the entire millennium, there should be way more talent on-hand. This perpetual state of “what are they doing?” makes it hard to imagine they’ll cash in their chips with Vooch and Gordon at the appropriate time (read: ASAP) and instead just end up in the late lottery anyway next summer while losing Vucevic for nothing in free agency. It would certainly be on-brand.

    The media seems to be in a rush to paint this season as the turning of a corner when what we’re really watching is nothing more than a slightly less depressing version of the same nonsense they’ve been trotting out for the last half-decade. I’m not falling for the sleight of hand this time.

    Verdict: OUT

    Credit: Gregory Shamus/Getty Images

    DETROIT PISTONS (13-13, 7th in Conference): If basketball is a game of runs, Detroit’s has been a season of runs. They won their first four, then dropped five in a row, then won nine of eleven, and are currently on a six-game losing streak. The 4-0 start was obvious fool’s gold, and their 9-13 record since then is likely a more accurate reflection of the true nature of the team, which puts them right square in the mix with all these other jokers. The schedule has been brutal during their six-game slide, and they’ve been dealing with some nagging injuries to their rotation of late, but these are night-to-night realities in the NBA. Their core three players (Blake Griffin, Andre Drummond, and Reggie Jackson) have played 77 of a possible 78 combined games. Blake is at the top of his game and putting up young Blake numbers (25.6/ 9.1/ 5.0) despite having to re-orient more to the perimeter, and yet the team is only sitting at .500 — with a negative point differential — because the rest of the roster, for lack of a better word, sucks.

    The Pistons are middle-of-the-pack in terms of pace and Defensive Rating (13th and 12th, respectively), but they are struggling because they simply cannot put the ball in the hoop with any consistency. They are currently 24th in Offensive Rating, 29th in FG%, 28th in 3P%, and dead-last in Effective FG%. Blake has too much responsibility on his shoulders as a creator. Drummond is what he’s always been, Jackson is “fine” — that is to say, a guy who shouldn’t be the third option for a team with any sort of aspirations — and the rest of the rotation consists of limited offensive players who need to hit catch-and-shoot threes but for the most part don’t.

    Unless fellow 22-year-olds Stanley Johnson and Luke Kennard take massive steps forward as the season wears on, the ceiling just isn’t very high for this roster. What’s worse, Detroit’s front office is more or less stuck with this core for the next two seasons: Griffin and Drummond’s contracts are probably immovable even if they wanted to, the electrifying combination of Jon Leuer, Langston Galloway, Ish Smith, and Glenn Robinson III will make an unforgivable $27 million combined this season, and the team is still on the hook for $5.3 million in dead money to Josh Freaking Smith this year AND next, which is the funniest damn thing I’ve read all day.

    It feels like we’ve already seen the best of the Pistons. A team employing this version of Blake has a high floor, but it also relies on him (and Jackson) to stay healthy all year, neither of which have been winning bets in the past. And people get at me for my Dwayne Casey take, but I’m doubling down on it: he just isn’t that good of a coach. I’m not saying he’s Vinny Del Negro/Byron Scott-level horrendous, but I can’t be the only one thinking those who voted him Coach of the Year last year are feeling more than a slight twinge of buyer’s remorse, especially after the Raptors unceremoniously fired him immediately after the playoffs and then came out of the gates firing on all cylinders this season after replacing him with the guy who, by all accounts, was actually the architect of the team’s improvement last season in the first place. Again, I’m not trying to clown on Casey or say he’s bad; he just isn’t some sort of coaching savant who creates this massive win delta for his teams in the way he sometimes gets portrayed. Anyway, Detroit kinda stinks and things are probably going to get worse.

    Verdict: OUT

    CHARLOTTE HORNETS (14-13, 6th in Conference): I’ve written and spoken at length about Charlotte over the last week-plus, so we’ll keep this brief. Since the podcast taped, Charlotte has won three straight (over Denver, New York, and Detroit), two of them in close, crunch-time fashion. [Bet you can guess which one was a double-digit win.] The results are beginning to match the process, and their schedule is relatively soft over the remainder of the calendar year, so we should start to see them solidify their playoff position over the upcoming stretch of games. The roster still has plenty of warts, but so long as Kemba stays healthy, this is, at worst, the sixth seed in the East.

    Verdict: IN

  • In Part 2, Geoff Barnes and I discuss the contenders in the Eastern Conference: the buzz saw in Toronto; did Philly win the Jimmy Butler trade?; and the new-look Bucks.

    Thanks for listening, and remember to Follow 24 Sloppy Seconds on Facebook and Twitter for all the new content!

    Geoff Barnes Part 2 – East Contenders

    Photo credit: Getty Images

  • In Part One of my conversation with Hornets’ superfan and friend of the pod Geoff Barnes, we break down Charlotte from all angles: their record vs. their “actual” play; Kemba’s career year and crunch-time struggles; the young guns; Batum’s struggles; MKG’s progression; and where they go from here.

    Thanks for listening, and remember to Follow 24 Sloppy Seconds on Facebook and Twitter!

    24SS Geoff Barnes: Part 1 – Hornets’ Buzz

    Photo credit: Nell Redman/AP


  • The NBA might be the greatest “What if?” sports league on the planet. What if the Blazers had picked MJ over Bowie? What if David Stern didn’t veto the CP3 trade? What if the cap spike of 2016 was distributed over several seasons? What if Bill Walton’s feet hadn’t been made of glass? What if Shaq and Kobe had figured out how to coexist? What if OKC didn’t foolishly trade Harden? What if Tim Duncan had signed with Orlando?

    These are just a few of the MANY examples, any one of which would have had massive downstream effects and changed league history in very fundamental ways. Today, I’m going to exercise my own NBA “What if?” freedom by concocting an even crazier scenario. The NBA expanded for the most recent (and final?) time in 2004, adding the Charlotte Bobcats (now Hornets) to bring the total to 30 franchises. There have been fifteen drafts since the expansion, meaning there have now been enough first-round picks to fill every roster in the league.

    So here’s the hypothetical premise: what if, instead of being drafted to a specific franchise, each first round pick since 2004 was instead simply assigned to a team made up of players drafted in the same draft slot? What would those teams look like, and how would they fare if they competed against one another?

    Obviously, this is all a silly flight of fancy and it’s going to be pretty subjective, but even so, it’s probably a good idea to establish some ground rules:

    1. Again, first round picks only. I know this leaves out a ton of excellent NBA players. Whatever. My game, my rules. Sorry, Draymond, DJ, Middleton, Jokic, and others — you aren’t part of my imaginary league.

    2. The numbers listed below are career figures, and obviously the different players on each squad are at different phases of their respective careers, or retired/out of the league altogether. Therefore, when making rotation decisions, I am essentially considering the “peak” version or vintage of the player. Yes, this is unfair to rookies and other young guys, since there is almost certainly going to be a better version of them which has yet to emerge. However, we can only go on the information we have presently, and said information is inherently asymmetrical.

    3. I have done my best to create positionally coherent rotations, but it is not always possible. Fit is taken into account in breaking down how competitive each team would be.

    The players on each roster are listed below in order of Win Shares per 48 Minutes to create some sort of organizing principle. After that I will select my preferred rotation, provide some analysis, and then power rank each squad from 1 to 30 — including the delta between the ranking and what we would expect.

    Without further ado, I give you the Draft Slot NBA, starting with our plucky underdogs at no. 30.

    [Massive thanks to Basketball-Reference.com and their Draft Finder tool for making this dumb exercise possible.]

    TEAM 30:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48

    2011 CHI Jimmy Butler F-G 479 32.9 16.6 4.9 3.4 1.6 0.5 .454 .345 .832 60.9 .185
    2015 GSW Kevon Looney F-C 150 12.6 3.8 3.2 0.8 0.4 0.6 .576 .211 .591 6.2 .156
    2005 NYK David Lee F 829 29.3 13.5 8.8 2.2 0.8 0.4 .535 .034 .772 76.0 .150
    2014 SAS Kyle Anderson F-G 280 18.9 5.0 3.8 1.8 1.0 0.5 .478 .329 .716 14.0 .127
    2016 GSW Damian Jones F-C 49 11.9 3.6 2.3 0.6 0.3 0.7 .643 .577 1.5 .126
    2012 GSW Festus Ezeli C 170 14.1 4.2 4.3 0.4 0.3 1.0 .513 .557 5.9 .119
    2017 UTA Josh Hart G 87 23.4 8.2 3.9 1.3 0.9 0.3 .465 .396 .696 4.7 .110
    2006 POR Joel Freeland F-C 151 12.1 3.2 3.4 0.4 0.2 0.4 .459 .000 .728 3.2 .084
    2018 ATL Omari Spellman F 22 18.2 6.3 4.5 1.0 0.8 0.6 .386 .317 .750 0.5 .065
    2008 BOS J.R. Giddens G 38 6.5 1.9 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 .476 .000 .565 0.1 .027
    2010 WAS Lazar Hayward F 72 8.2 2.9 1.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 .347 .269 .767 0.2 .020
    2009 CLE Christian Eyenga F 51 20.6 6.3 2.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 .411 .277 .611 -0.4 -0.020
    2013 PHO Nemanja Nedovic G 24 5.9 1.1 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 .205 .167 .875 -0.4 -0.132
    2007 PHI Petteri Koponen G
    STARTERS:
    C: Kevon Looney
    F: David Lee
    F: Kyle Anderson
    G: Jimmy Butler
    G: Josh Hart
    BENCH:
    C: Festus Ezeli
    F: Damion Jones
    F: Omari Spellman
    F: Joel Freeland
    Hey, not a bad start! Considering what we would expect from the no. 30 slot, a team featuring two All-Stars (Butler and Lee) and several other very solid role players would do surprisingly well. The guard rotation would be a legitimate problem, but they could always use Slo Mo as a nominal point guard, and it’s not as though Jimmy Butler isn’t used to playing heavy minutes. A pleasantly competitive roster.
    [Note: Team 30 only has 14 players because Minnesota forfeited its first round pick in 2004 due to salary cap violations. Life is unfair for the little guy. You have no idea how badly I wanted to make a “KAAAAAAAHHHNNN!!!” joke about this, but alas, David Kahn didn’t become the Wolves’ GM until 2009. Things are tough all around.]
    Power Rank: 16 (+14)
    TEAM 29:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48

    2011 SAS Cory Joseph G 470 21.1 7.0 2.5 2.7 0.7 0.2 .451 .338 .761 19.7 .095
    2010 ORL Daniel Orton C-F 51 10.6 2.8 2.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 .485 .000 .597 1.0 .093
    2008 DET D.J. White F 138 15.3 5.9 3.2 0.6 0.3 0.4 .507 .333 .720 3.8 .087
    2005 MIA Wayne Simien F 51 9.9 3.3 1.9 0.2 0.3 0.0 .469 .854 0.9 .083
    2009 LAL Toney Douglas G 394 19.1 7.6 2.2 2.3 0.9 0.1 .404 .354 .824 12.1 .077
    2016 SAS Dejounte Murray G 119 17.4 6.6 4.2 2.3 0.9 0.3 .441 .316 .708 3.2 .074
    2004 IND David Harrison C 189 14.2 5.0 2.9 0.2 0.3 1.0 .530 .525 3.2 .057
    2015 BRK Chris McCullough F 59 9.0 3.3 1.9 0.3 0.5 0.3 .426 .306 .548 0.6 .054
    2007 PHO Alando Tucker F 51 8.4 4.1 1.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 .423 .294 .783 0.4 .045
    2017 SAS Derrick White G 33 14.0 4.5 2.2 1.9 0.4 0.1 .419 .385 .722 0.4 .043
    2014 OKC Josh Huestis F 76 14.1 2.5 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.6 .346 .312 .240 0.7 .030
    2013 OKC Archie Goodwin G 165 14.5 6.3 2.0 1.2 0.4 0.2 .429 .236 .700 1.1 .022
    2006 NYK Mardy Collins G 189 14.7 3.9 1.8 1.7 0.6 0.1 .380 .299 .599 -1.6 -0.027
    2012 CHI Marquis Teague G 91 10.0 2.4 1.0 1.5 0.3 0.1 .343 .222 .661 -0.9 -0.045
    2018 BRK Dzanan Musa G-F 7 3.7 1.7 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 .429 .000 .000 -0.1 -0.184
    STARTERS:
    C: David Harrison
    F: DJ White
    G: Derrick White
    G: Dejounte Murray
    G: Cory Joseph
    BENCH:
    G: Toney Douglas
    F: Wayne Simien
    C: Daniel Orton
    F: Chris McCullough
    F: Dzanan Musa
    Woof. There’s no way to polish the turd — this team would be atrocious. Outside of the triumvirate of competent guards selected by San Antonio (you’re going to see a lot of Spurs’ players in the early going, for obvious reasons), there is just nothing to work with here. Let’s move on.
    Power Rank: 30 (-1)
    TEAM 28:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48

    2007 SAS Tiago Splitter F-C 355 19.2 7.9 5.0 1.2 0.6 0.6 .555 .143 .697 25.3 .178
    2005 SAS Ian Mahinmi C 559 16.5 5.1 4.3 0.5 0.5 0.7 .539 .071 .609 24.0 .125
    2004 SAS Beno Udrih G 831 21.9 8.4 2.1 3.4 0.7 0.1 .463 .349 .833 31.4 .083
    2016 PHO Skal Labissiere F 100 18.9 8.3 4.6 1.0 0.4 0.6 .476 .344 .766 2.7 .068
    2010 MEM Greivis Vasquez G 401 23.7 9.0 2.5 4.8 0.6 0.1 .418 .349 .817 12.6 .064
    2009 MIN Wayne Ellington G 608 21.1 8.0 2.2 1.1 0.5 0.1 .410 .381 .851 16.0 .060
    2012 OKC Perry Jones F 143 11.7 3.4 1.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 .420 .293 .660 1.7 .048
    2015 BOS R.J. Hunter G 44 8.4 2.6 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.1 .361 .282 .889 0.3 .039
    2017 LAL Tony Bradley F-C 9 3.2 0.9 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 .273 .000 1.000 0.0 .033
    2011 CHI Norris Cole G 360 22.3 7.0 2.0 2.7 0.8 0.1 .407 .324 .743 3.0 .018
    2008 MEM Donte Greene F 253 16.8 6.1 2.4 0.7 0.4 0.5 .406 .304 .701 1.5 .017
    2014 LAC C.J. Wilcox G 66 5.7 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 .370 .333 .813 0.1 .007
    2006 DAL Maurice Ager G 82 6.2 2.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 .339 .250 .566 -0.9 -0.089
    2018 GSW Jacob Evans G-F 17 4.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.1 .188 .250 -0.2 -0.100
    2013 SAS Livio Jean-Charles F
    STARTERS:
    C: Ian Mahinmi
    F: Tiago Splitter
    G/F: Wayne Ellington
    G: Greivis Vasquez
    G: Beno Udrih
    BENCH:
    F: Skal Labissiere
    G: Norris Cole
    F: Perry Jones
    F: Tony Bradley
    OK, that’s a little better. There is at least something resembling a functional NBA roster here. Udrih was an underrated playmaker, the frountcourt would battle, and Ellington, while obviously miscast as a primary scorer, gives them someone who can shoot and put the ball in the hoop with some consistency. It would be an uphill climb, but they would stick it to Team 29, if nothing else.
    Power Rank: 29 (-1)
    TEAM 27:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48

    2018 BOS Robert Williams F 9 3.7 1.4 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.7 .750 .500 0.2 .316
    2013 DEN Rudy Gobert C 350 28.3 10.4 10.2 1.2 0.7 2.2 .622 .000 .626 42.5 .206
    2016 TOR Pascal Siakam F 162 20.5 7.4 4.4 1.5 0.7 0.6 .537 .245 .695 9.7 .141
    2015 LAL Larry Nance Jr. F-C 214 21.7 7.2 6.0 1.3 1.2 0.5 .543 .263 .690 12.8 .132
    2012 MIA Arnett Moultrie F 59 12.4 3.6 3.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 .547 .667 1.7 .113
    2009 MEM DeMarre Carroll F 502 23.9 8.9 4.2 1.2 1.0 0.3 .434 .362 .744 26.4 .106
    2004 LAL Sasha Vujacic G 581 15.3 5.3 1.9 1.3 0.6 0.1 .390 .367 .858 16.0 .086
    2005 POR Linas Kleiza F 409 20.0 8.7 3.6 0.8 0.4 0.2 .435 .335 .763 13.6 .080
    2017 BRK Kyle Kuzma F 101 31.2 16.3 6.1 1.9 0.6 0.5 .455 .352 .714 5.2 .080
    2007 DET Arron Afflalo G 762 27.3 10.8 2.9 1.8 0.4 0.2 .450 .386 .825 33.5 .077
    2014 PHO Bogdan Bogdanovic G 90 27.6 12.2 2.9 3.3 0.9 0.2 .446 .393 .857 3.6 .070
    2008 NOH Darrell Arthur F 503 17.8 6.5 3.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 .444 .352 .765 12.3 .066
    2010 NJN Jordan Crawford G 281 24.4 12.2 2.5 3.1 0.7 0.1 .411 .317 .826 6.3 .044
    2006 PHO Sergio Rodriguez G 353 15.0 4.9 1.5 3.4 0.6 0.0 .409 .337 .739 4.3 .039
    2011 NJN JaJuan Johnson F 36 8.3 3.2 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.4 .446 .667 0.2 .032
    STARTERS:
    C: Rudy Gobert
    F: Pascal Siakam
    F: DeMarre Carroll
    G: Arron Afflalo
    G: Bogdan Bogdanovic
    BENCH:
    F: Kyle Kuzma
    F/C: Larry Nance, Jr.
    G: Sasha Vujacic
    F: Linas Kleiza
    G: Jordan Crawford
    F: Darrell Arthur
    Look at that frontcourt depth! Ball handling and playmaking would for sure be a struggle, but this squad has a lot of smart, rugged dudes who would make more talented teams work for it, and if all else failed, they’d still have the Stifle Tower waiting at the rim. Color me intrigued.
    Power Rank: 15 (+12)
    TEAM 26:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2008 SAS George Hill G 679 28.7 11.6 3.1 3.3 0.9 0.3 .455 .384 .801 57.7 .142
    2004 SAC Kevin Martin G 714 30.2 17.4 3.2 1.9 0.9 0.1 .437 .384 .870 61.3 .137
    2009 CHI Taj Gibson F 692 26.1 9.8 6.4 1.0 0.6 1.1 .507 .228 .703 46.9 .125
    2013 MIN Andre Roberson G-F 295 22.5 4.6 4.0 0.9 0.9 0.7 .482 .257 .467 12.7 .092
    2012 IND Miles Plumlee C-F 344 16.4 4.9 4.5 0.5 0.4 0.7 .542 .546 10.6 .090
    2005 DET Jason Maxiell F 618 18.4 5.6 4.2 0.4 0.4 0.8 .495 .000 .564 20.3 .086
    2018 PHI Landry Shamet G 26 21.2 8.0 1.3 1.0 0.5 0.1 .432 .378 .846 1.0 .086
    2010 OKC Quincy Pondexter G-F 322 16.7 4.8 1.9 0.8 0.4 0.1 .420 .354 .745 9.3 .083
    2016 PHI Furkan Korkmaz G 32 9.0 3.3 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.0 .359 .295 .778 0.5 .076
    2007 HOU Aaron Brooks G 645 20.8 9.7 1.7 3.0 0.6 0.1 .413 .370 .837 19.2 .069
    2011 DAL Jordan Hamilton G-F 151 13.9 5.9 2.8 0.8 0.5 0.2 .408 .357 .670 3.0 .069
    2006 LAL Jordan Farmar G 504 19.5 7.7 1.9 2.9 0.8 0.1 .423 .374 .739 13.9 .068
    2014 MIA P.J. Hairston G-F 111 18.0 6.0 2.4 0.5 0.5 0.2 .343 .295 .810 0.9 .021
    2017 POR Caleb Swanigan F 37 7.8 2.3 2.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 .366 .167 .696 -0.2 -0.027
    2015 SAS Nikola Milutinov C
    STARTERS:
    C/F: Jason Maxiell
    F: Taj Gibson
    F: Andre Roberson
    G: Kevin Martin
    G: George Hill
    BENCH:
    G: Aaron Brooks
    G: Jordan Farmar
    C: Miles Plumlee
    F: Quincy Pondexter
    G: Landry Shamet
    Team Role Player. Martin would naturally be the lead dog on offense for this star-less squad, but they would overcome their lack of size and frontline talent with tenacious, on-a-string defense and solid professionalism. They wouldn’t win a lot, but they would force the upper echelon teams to bring a real effort or potentially get embarrassed.
    Power Rank: 22 (+4)
    TEAM 25:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2014 HOU Clint Capela C 251 23.7 11.3 8.5 0.9 0.6 1.5 .635 .000 .495 24.3 .196
    2008 HOU Nicolas Batum F-G 716 31.6 12.0 5.3 3.8 1.0 0.6 .435 .355 .839 51.5 .109
    2004 BOS Tony Allen G-F 820 22.0 8.1 3.5 1.3 1.4 0.4 .475 .282 .709 38.7 .103
    2013 LAC Reggie Bullock G-F 227 17.1 5.8 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.1 .439 .395 .821 7.6 .094
    2009 OKC Rodrigue Beaubois G 182 15.9 7.1 1.9 2.1 0.7 0.3 .439 .325 .810 4.8 .079
    2016 LAC Brice Johnson F 21 5.1 2.2 1.6 0.1 0.5 0.3 .449 .000 .600 0.1 .062
    2006 CLE Shannon Brown G 408 18.0 7.6 1.9 1.1 0.7 0.2 .420 .332 .807 9.2 .060
    2011 BOS MarShon Brooks G-F 191 17.5 8.1 2.2 1.5 0.6 0.2 .445 .354 .759 3.3 .047
    2015 MEM Jarell Martin F 156 17.6 5.9 3.8 0.7 0.4 0.4 .432 .324 .768 2.7 .047
    2005 SEA Johan Petro C 473 15.4 4.7 3.9 0.5 0.4 0.5 .462 .154 .678 5.5 .037
    2010 MEM Dominique Jones G 80 9.3 3.1 1.4 1.8 0.4 0.1 .366 .095 .729 0.3 .017
    2007 UTA Morris Almond G 38 9.5 3.1 1.2 0.3 0.3 0.1 .381 .292 .743 0.0 .005
    2018 LAL Moritz Wagner F-C 4 4.3 2.5 1.0 0.8 0.3 0.0 .273 .333 1.000 0.0 -0.063
    2012 MEM Tony Wroten G 145 21.2 11.1 2.5 3.0 0.9 0.2 .413 .231 .647 -1.3 -0.021
    2017 ORL Anzejs Pasecniks C
    STARTERS: 
    C: Clint Capela
    F: Nicolas Batum
    F: Reggie Bullock
    G: Tony Allen
    G: Roddy Beaubois
    BENCH:
    G: Shannon Brown
    F: Jarell Martin
    G: MarShon Brooks
    C: Johan Petro
    G: Tony Wroten
    Team 25 would have a tough time handling size and a really tough time getting buckets consistently, so it’s hard to see them having much success. Capela/Allen/young Batum would make it a grind for opposing offenses, but this team would struggle.
    Power Rank: 26 (-1)TEAM 24:

    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2017 UTA Tyler Lydon F 8 3.5 2.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 .750 .750 .500 0.1 .196
    2006 MEM Kyle Lowry G 816 31.2 14.5 4.2 6.0 1.3 0.3 .425 .369 .804 83.3 .157
    2008 SEA Serge Ibaka F-C 704 28.8 12.2 7.2 0.7 0.4 2.2 .514 .363 .763 60.3 .142
    2007 PHO Rudy Fernandez G 249 24.0 9.1 2.4 2.2 1.0 0.2 .399 .360 .840 14.2 .114
    2011 OKC Reggie Jackson G 470 24.9 12.6 3.0 4.4 0.7 0.1 .428 .321 .858 24.7 .101
    2004 BOS Delonte West G 432 27.4 9.7 2.9 3.6 1.1 0.4 .448 .372 .826 24.5 .099
    2005 HOU Luther Head G 348 22.4 8.2 2.4 2.1 0.7 0.1 .423 .388 .773 14.7 .090
    2015 CLE Tyus Jones G 203 16.0 4.4 1.4 2.8 1.0 0.1 .410 .333 .802 5.8 .086
    2013 NYK Tim Hardaway G 362 25.6 12.8 2.5 1.8 0.6 0.2 .422 .346 .812 14.7 .076
    2014 CHH Shabazz Napier G 255 15.7 5.9 1.7 1.9 0.8 0.1 .393 .364 .807 5.0 .059
    2016 PHI Timothe Luwawu F 135 15.6 5.8 1.8 1.0 0.4 0.1 .387 .319 .829 1.7 .038
    2012 CLE Jared Cunningham G 84 7.2 2.3 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.0 .347 .306 .674 0.2 .017
    2009 DAL Byron Mullens C 189 18.2 7.4 4.2 0.8 0.4 0.5 .408 .319 .706 0.6 .008
    2018 POR Anfernee Simons G 5 6.8 2.2 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 .333 .000 .250 -0.2 -0.244
    2010 ATL Damion James G-F 39 16.0 3.8 3.4 0.7 0.6 0.5 .415 .000 .667 0.0 -0.001
    STARTERS:
    C: Serge Ibaka
    F: Tim Hardaway, Jr.
    G: Rudy Fernandez
    G: Reggie Jackson
    G: Kyle Lowry
    BENCH:
    G: Delonte West
    G: Tyus Jones
    G: Shabazz Napier
    G: Luther Head
    F: Timothe Luwawu-Cabarrot
    Obviously this team would be WAY too guard-heavy, but the overall talent is pretty decent. Despite being far too reliant on Ibaka for rim protection and rebounding, they would be able to stay in games by turning it into a track meet and trying to outscore more talented opponents. A fun fake League Pass team.
    Power Rank: 14 (+10)
    TEAM 23:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2011 HOU Nikola Mirotic F 295 24.3 12.3 6.0 1.3 0.8 0.7 .424 .358 .805 19.6 .131
    2016 BOS Ante Zizic F-C 49 7.6 3.6 2.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 .640 .679 1.0 .127
    2008 UTA Kosta Koufos C 653 16.7 5.8 5.1 0.5 0.4 0.8 .537 .000 .587 27.9 .123
    2010 MIN Trevor Booker F 532 20.4 6.9 5.5 1.1 0.7 0.5 .515 .305 .636 26.2 .116
    2006 NJN Josh Boone F-C 256 17.5 5.2 4.9 0.5 0.4 0.7 .544 .445 9.1 .097
    2014 UTA Rodney Hood G-F 272 27.6 13.0 3.0 2.0 0.8 0.2 .420 .369 .836 14.3 .092
    2017 TOR OG Anunoby F 94 20.2 6.4 2.5 0.7 0.7 0.2 .466 .352 .570 3.5 .089
    2018 IND Aaron Holiday G 14 11.9 6.4 1.8 1.4 0.4 0.1 .446 .270 .813 0.3 .087
    2015 POR Rondae Hollis-Jefferson F 197 24.4 10.1 6.1 2.0 1.0 0.6 .450 .227 .752 8.3 .083
    2009 SAC Omri Casspi F 569 20.5 7.9 4.0 1.1 0.6 0.2 .452 .369 .674 18.9 .078
    2005 SAC Francisco Garcia F-G 549 21.6 7.9 2.6 1.4 0.8 0.7 .427 .357 .799 18.2 .074
    2012 ATL John Jenkins G 145 12.8 5.1 1.5 0.8 0.2 0.1 .448 .364 .849 2.7 .071
    2007 NYK Wilson Chandler F 604 31.0 13.3 5.4 1.8 0.7 0.6 .445 .342 .767 27.2 .070
    2013 IND Solomon Hill F 275 23.0 6.0 3.3 1.6 0.7 0.2 .394 .327 .810 8.7 .066
    2004 POR Sergei Monia F 26 13.2 3.0 2.0 0.7 0.3 0.2 .333 .265 .714 -0.2 -0.025
    STARTERS:
    C: Kosta Koufos
    F: Nikola Mirotic
    F: Wilson Chandler
    G: Rodney Hood
    G: Aaron Holiday
    BENCH:
    F: Trevor Booker
    F: OG Anunoby
    F: Rondae Hollis-Jefferson
    G: Francisco Garcia
    F: Omri Casspi
    Another super-lopsided roster. Playmaking would be a major problem with their lack of guard depth. The long, active bench unit could be kind of fun, but beyond Mirotic bombing away with impunity, it’s hard to see where consistent scoring would come from on this team.
    Power Rank: 20 (+3)
    TEAM 22:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2011 DEN Kenneth Faried F 449 24.6 11.3 8.1 1.0 0.7 0.8 .544 .100 .654 36.1 .157
    2017 BRK Jarrett Allen F-C 96 22.0 9.2 6.1 0.9 0.4 1.3 .586 .235 .746 6.6 .150
    2013 BRK Mason Plumlee C-F 413 22.0 8.5 6.2 2.0 0.8 1.0 .568 .050 .561 26.8 .141
    2007 CHA Jared Dudley F-G 814 23.4 7.8 3.3 1.6 0.8 0.2 .464 .392 .732 40.5 .102
    2015 CHI Bobby Portis F 203 19.0 9.3 5.8 1.1 0.5 0.3 .462 .343 .731 7.4 .092
    2008 ORL Courtney Lee G 754 28.1 10.0 2.7 1.7 1.0 0.3 .451 .389 .856 38.3 .087
    2005 DEN Jarrett Jack G 867 27.8 10.8 2.9 4.6 0.8 0.1 .440 .343 .855 36.8 .073
    2014 MEM Jordan Adams G 32 8.2 3.2 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.2 .402 .385 .607 0.4 .070
    2004 NJN Viktor Khryapa F 143 16.4 4.5 3.4 1.0 0.6 0.3 .443 .292 .658 2.0 .041
    2010 POR Elliot Williams G 109 13.5 4.9 1.5 0.9 0.4 0.1 .421 .310 .669 0.7 .024
    2012 BOS Fab Melo C 6 6.0 1.2 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.3 .500 .250 0.0 .021
    2018 CHI Chandler Hutchison G 21 18.5 4.5 4.1 0.7 0.6 0.2 .420 .227 .652 0.1 .013
    2009 POR Victor Claver F 80 13.4 3.2 2.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 .398 .293 .585 0.2 .011
    2016 CHO Malachi Richardson G 60 9.8 3.1 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 .358 .289 .773 -0.2 -0.013
    2006 NJN Marcus Williams G 203 15.2 5.6 1.8 2.8 0.4 0.0 .386 .321 .767 0.0 -0.001
    STARTERS:
    C: Mason Plumlee
    F: Kenneth Faried
    F: Jared Dudley
    G: Courtney Lee
    G: Jarrett Jack
    BENCH:
    C: Jarrett Allen
    F: Bobby Portis
    G: Chandler Hutchison
    G: Malachi Richardson
    Another team of capable role players with nothing to bring them together. Consummate pros Jack and Dudley would maximize the strengths of the group, but there just isn’t a whole lot to work with here offensively. Way too many busts on this roster, resulting in a super-young bench which would probably get worked most nights.
    Power Rank: 25 (-3)
    TEAM 21:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2008 NJN Ryan Anderson F 637 26.2 12.5 5.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 .422 .380 .854 46.8 .134
    2012 BOS Jared Sullinger F 269 24.3 10.8 7.5 1.8 0.7 0.6 .436 .272 .723 15.3 .113
    2009 NOH Darren Collison G 656 29.5 12.6 2.6 4.9 1.1 0.2 .471 .391 .852 44.7 .111
    2013 UTA Gorgui Dieng C 401 23.8 8.1 6.5 1.4 0.8 1.0 .504 .313 .786 22.1 .111
    2006 PHO Rajon Rondo G 790 31.7 10.4 4.8 8.5 1.7 0.1 .463 .311 .604 57.5 .110
    2014 OKC Mitch McGary F-C 52 10.7 4.4 3.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 .527 .000 .580 1.3 .108
    2005 PHO Nate Robinson G 618 22.5 11.0 2.3 3.0 0.9 0.1 .423 .360 .796 27.8 .096
    2015 DAL Justin Anderson G 176 14.0 5.8 2.7 0.7 0.5 0.3 .422 .293 .788 4.3 .085
    2017 OKC Terrance Ferguson G-F 78 14.6 3.3 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.2 .399 .315 .875 1.6 .066
    2007 PHI Daequan Cook G 328 18.3 6.4 2.1 0.7 0.4 0.1 .369 .359 .813 4.9 .039
    2016 ATL DeAndre Bembry F 89 15.8 5.0 2.7 1.6 0.7 0.4 .427 .287 .559 0.0 .002
    2004 UTA Pavel Podkolzin C 6 4.7 0.7 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 .000 .500 -0.1 -0.163
    2010 OKC Craig Brackins F 17 7.1 1.8 1.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 .265 .214 .500 -0.2 -0.089
    2018 UTA Grayson Allen G 14 10.5 4.6 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 .345 .286 .696 -0.1 -0.048
    2011 POR Nolan Smith G 84 9.9 3.3 1.0 1.2 0.3 0.0 .371 .260 .714 -0.8 -0.047
    STARTERS:
    C: Gorgui Dieng
    F: Jared Sullinger
    F: Ryan Anderson
    G: Darren Collison
    G: Rajon Rondo
    BENCH:
    G: Nate Robinson
    G: Justin Anderson
    G/F: Terrance “Turd” Ferguson
    F: DeAndre’ Bembry
    A moderately intriguing starting lineup that wouldn’t be able to stop anyone. Lousy bench. Hard to believe these teams aren’t getting much better yet.
    Power Rank: 23 (-2)
    TEAM 20:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2015 TOR Delon Wright G 144 17.0 6.5 2.2 2.2 0.8 0.4 .454 .375 .811 7.0 .137
    2006 NYK Renaldo Balkman F 221 13.9 4.0 3.5 0.6 0.7 0.5 .510 .172 .542 7.2 .113
    2004 DEN Jameer Nelson G 878 27.9 11.3 3.0 5.1 0.9 0.1 .436 .368 .810 48.3 .094
    2008 CHA Alexis Ajinca C 293 13.3 5.3 3.9 0.5 0.3 0.6 .503 .286 .797 7.5 .093
    2011 MIN Donatas Motiejunas F-C 248 18.4 7.4 3.8 1.1 0.5 0.3 .469 .300 .600 7.2 .076
    2012 DEN Evan Fournier G-F 401 27.4 13.3 2.7 2.4 0.8 0.1 .446 .374 .802 16.7 .073
    2007 MIA Jason Smith F-C 608 16.4 6.2 3.4 0.7 0.3 0.7 .469 .335 .782 14.1 .068
    2016 IND Caris LeVert G-F 142 24.8 11.1 3.6 3.2 1.0 0.2 .446 .333 .716 5.0 .068
    2013 CHI Tony Snell G-F 391 22.3 6.3 2.4 1.0 0.5 0.2 .421 .379 .816 11.3 .062
    2009 UTA Eric Maynor G 267 14.6 4.3 1.3 2.8 0.4 0.1 .392 .350 .721 3.3 .041
    2010 SAS James Anderson G-F 247 17.5 5.8 2.3 1.2 0.5 0.2 .411 .321 .755 3.3 .037
    2018 MIN Josh Okogie G 17 20.0 7.3 3.3 1.0 0.9 0.3 .381 .306 .760 0.1 .021
    2017 POR Harry Giles F-C 18 10.3 5.4 3.1 1.2 0.7 0.2 .468 .000 .476 0.0 .013
    2005 DEN Julius Hodge G 23 4.3 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.3 0.0 .440 .500 0.0 .003
    2014 TOR Bruno Caboclo F 35 6.1 1.5 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 .282 .242 .833 -0.4 -0.080
    STARTERS:
    C: Donatas Motiejunas
    F: Caris LeVert
    F: Evan Fournier
    G: Delon Wright
    G: Jameer Nelson
    BENCH:
    F: Tony Snell
    C: Alexis Ajinca
    G: Eric Maynor
    G: Josh Okogie
    C: Harry Giles
    C/F: Jason Smith
    A strange team. They would probably have enough scoring to stay competitive, but how the pieces would fit together — and if they could get any stops — is anybody’s guess. Much like team totem Bruno Caboclo, this squad might forever be two years away from being two years away. Despite not being any good, Renaldo Balkman would end up in the rotation somehow.
    Power Rank: 27 (-7)
    TEAM 19:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2017 ATL John Collins F 84 24.5 11.3 7.4 1.5 0.6 1.0 .585 .294 .723 6.1 .143
    2009 ATL Jeff Teague G 689 27.7 12.7 2.5 5.7 1.2 0.3 .445 .355 .845 47.2 .119
    2011 CHA Tobias Harris F 488 29.9 14.9 5.8 1.8 0.7 0.5 .469 .360 .814 34.7 .114
    2004 MIA Dorell Wright F-G 549 22.4 8.4 3.8 1.5 0.8 0.5 .424 .365 .806 25.9 .101
    2005 MEM Hakim Warrick F 526 20.2 9.4 4.0 0.8 0.4 0.3 .490 .191 .726 20.4 .092
    2014 CHI Gary Harris G 276 28.7 12.6 2.6 2.2 1.3 0.2 .466 .366 .801 15.1 .091
    2008 CLE J.J. Hickson F-C 534 22.3 9.5 6.8 0.8 0.5 0.6 .505 .000 .617 21.9 .088
    2015 WAS Jerian Grant G 238 18.8 6.4 2.0 3.1 0.8 0.1 .408 .318 .773 7.0 .075
    2016 DEN Malik Beasley G 108 11.1 4.3 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.1 .444 .368 .714 1.5 .060
    2010 BOS Avery Bradley G 477 28.5 12.2 3.0 1.7 1.1 0.2 .437 .364 .771 13.9 .049
    2012 ORL Andrew Nicholson F 285 14.3 6.0 3.0 0.4 0.3 0.3 .467 .321 .773 3.8 .045
    2013 CLE Sergey Karasev G-F 95 11.7 3.0 1.5 0.9 0.3 0.0 .395 .282 .842 0.8 .036
    2018 ATL Kevin Huerter G 24 20.9 6.1 3.3 2.1 0.6 0.3 .405 .389 .750 0.4 .035
    2007 LAL Javaris Crittenton G 113 16.4 5.3 2.4 1.8 0.5 0.1 .442 .231 .638 0.1 .002
    2006 SAC Quincy Douby G 143 10.7 4.1 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 .389 .312 .884 0.0 .000
    STARTERS:
    C: J.J. Hickson
    F: John Collins
    F: Tobias Harris
    G: Gary Harris
    G: Jeff Teague
    BENCH:
    G: Avery Bradley
    F/G: Dorell Wright
    G: Malik Beasley
    G: Kevin Huerter
    F: Hakim Warrick
    I can get behind this roster. There would be athleticism up front, along with balanced scoring from behind the arc, off the bounce, and out of the pick-and-roll. The names don’t jump off the page, but the rotation would be full of competent pros, and it would probably fit together well. A sleeper to outplay their position. Javaris Crittenton is preemptively banned from their locker room.
    Power Rank: 12 (+7)
    TEAM 18:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2008 WAS JaVale McGee C 582 17.0 7.7 4.8 0.4 0.4 1.5 .563 .105 .586 28.1 .136
    2012 HOU Terrence Jones F 232 24.0 10.5 5.7 1.0 0.6 1.2 .501 .299 .622 14.8 .128
    2009 MIN Ty Lawson G 551 29.2 12.7 2.7 6.0 1.2 0.1 .460 .359 .770 42.1 .126
    2010 OKC Eric Bledsoe G 515 27.8 13.9 3.8 4.7 1.5 0.5 .453 .339 .797 31.8 .107
    2015 HOU Sam Dekker F 162 15.3 5.3 3.0 0.8 0.5 0.2 .480 .288 .619 4.6 .090
    2004 NOH J.R. Smith G-F 971 27.0 12.5 3.2 2.1 1.0 0.2 .419 .373 .732 46.5 .085
    2007 GSW Marco Belinelli G-F 748 23.2 9.9 2.0 1.7 0.6 0.1 .424 .375 .842 27.3 .076
    2005 BOS Gerald Green G-F 604 19.7 9.7 2.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 .418 .360 .816 16.7 .068
    2017 IND T.J. Leaf F 67 8.3 2.7 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 .453 .385 .625 0.8 .068
    2013 ATL Shane Larkin G 256 19.1 5.5 1.9 2.9 0.9 0.1 .422 .336 .777 4.4 .044
    2011 WAS Chris Singleton F 148 17.6 4.1 3.2 0.6 0.8 0.4 .376 .319 .633 2.3 .042
    2014 PHO Tyler Ennis G 186 12.6 4.2 1.3 1.9 0.5 0.1 .419 .317 .768 1.3 .026
    2006 WAS Oleksiy Pecherov C 111 9.4 3.9 2.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 .386 .290 .793 0.5 .025
    2016 DET Henry Ellenson F 58 8.3 3.8 2.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 .363 .320 .795 0.0 -0.003
    2018 SAS Lonnie Walker G
    STARTERS:
    C: JaVale McGee
    F: Terrence Jones
    G: J.R. Smith
    G: Eric Bledsoe
    G: Ty Lawson
    BENCH:
    G/F: Marco Belinelli
    G/F: Gerald Green
    G: Shane Larkin
    F: Sam Dekker
    This team would not be good, but it would be unbelievably entertaining to follow them on social media and watch the locker room gradually come apart at the seams. I mean, they legitimately go six deep with knuckleheads. These are the Wizards of Draft Slot NBA, which is appropriate, since the IRL Wizards drafted three of the dudes on this roster. Art imitating life, or something like that.
    Power Rank: 28 (-10)
    TEAM 17:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2005 IND Danny Granger F 586 31.5 16.8 4.9 1.9 1.0 0.8 .434 .380 .848 48.5 .126
    2012 DAL Tyler Zeller F-C 406 17.6 7.0 4.4 0.9 0.3 0.6 .508 .294 .764 16.8 .112
    2008 TOR Roy Hibbert C 662 24.8 10.0 6.3 1.3 0.4 1.7 .465 .250 .755 35.9 .105
    2009 PHI Jrue Holiday G 611 32.9 15.2 3.7 6.3 1.5 0.5 .451 .355 .785 35.9 .086
    2004 ATL Josh Smith F 894 32.4 14.5 7.4 3.1 1.2 1.9 .452 .285 .632 51.0 .084
    2017 MIL D.J. Wilson F 23 3.3 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0 .579 .500 .500 0.1 .082
    2007 NJN Sean Williams C-F 137 14.4 4.2 3.4 0.3 0.3 1.2 .511 .000 .624 3.0 .073
    2018 MIL Donte DiVincenzo G 18 17.1 5.6 2.7 1.4 0.5 0.1 .409 .262 .818 0.4 .069
    2013 ATL Dennis Schroder G 375 24.1 13.1 2.6 4.8 0.8 0.1 .433 .323 .829 11.5 .061
    2006 IND Shawne Williams F 314 17.1 5.6 3.0 0.7 0.4 0.5 .403 .339 .755 6.7 .060
    2011 NYK Iman Shumpert G 404 25.4 7.4 3.4 1.9 1.2 0.2 .398 .343 .769 12.7 .059
    2014 BOS James Young G-F 95 8.5 2.3 1.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 .367 .277 .563 0.8 .046
    2010 CHI Kevin Seraphin F 423 15.2 5.9 3.5 0.6 0.2 0.7 .489 .000 .715 5.9 .044
    2016 MEM Wade Baldwin G 48 11.0 3.1 1.2 1.5 0.4 0.2 .351 .258 .787 -0.3 -0.026
    2015 MIL Rashad Vaughn G 139 12.0 3.0 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 .337 .313 .692 -0.6 -0.017
    STARTERS:
    C: Roy Hibbert
    F: Josh Smith
    F: Danny Granger
    G: Jrue Holiday
    G: Dennis Schroder
    BENCH:
    G: Iman Shumpert
    C: Tyler Zeller
    G: Donte DiVincenzo
    F: Sean/Shawne Williams (is there a difference?)
    Shooting would be a real problem, but this team could be FIERCE on defense. Prime Danny Granger was a legit scorer (25.8 ppg in ’08-’09), and he would have a much better roster around him (plus verticality enthusiast Roy Hibbert; he’s still there). Holiday/Schroder is an interesting backcourt, and J-Smoove would be there to do J-Smoove things (i.e. jack crooked jumpers while doing most everything else pretty well). A little bit of sleeper potential here.
    Power Rank: 11 (+6)
    TEAM 16:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2013 BOS Lucas Nogueira C 141 12.4 3.2 2.8 0.5 0.6 1.0 .632 .265 .640 6.0 .165
    2017 CHI Justin Patton C 1 4.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 .500 0.0 .151
    2011 PHI Nikola Vucevic C 481 29.9 15.1 9.9 2.3 0.8 0.9 .502 .329 .737 35.1 .117
    2008 PHI Marreese Speights C-F 705 15.1 7.9 4.1 0.7 0.3 0.5 .459 .356 .797 25.8 .116
    2016 BOS Guerschon Yabusele F 45 6.5 2.3 1.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 .393 .304 .733 0.7 .116
    2009 CHI James Johnson F 555 20.6 8.0 3.6 2.1 0.8 0.9 .479 .301 .696 21.9 .092
    2014 CHI Jusuf Nurkic C 262 22.0 10.8 7.6 1.6 0.8 1.2 .488 .088 .632 11.1 .092
    2015 BOS Terry Rozier G 216 19.2 7.3 3.5 2.1 0.7 0.2 .377 .355 .765 7.5 .086
    2010 MIN Luke Babbitt F 381 14.0 4.8 2.2 0.6 0.2 0.2 .408 .402 .747 7.2 .065
    2006 CHI Rodney Carney F 299 15.4 5.9 2.0 0.4 0.5 0.3 .422 .338 .704 6.2 .064
    2004 UTA Kirk Snyder G 211 16.8 6.3 2.3 1.1 0.4 0.3 .438 .327 .699 4.5 .061
    2005 TOR Joey Graham F 377 16.2 5.9 2.8 0.5 0.4 0.1 .483 .300 .815 7.8 .061
    2007 WAS Nick Young G-F 716 22.9 11.4 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 .418 .376 .836 18.6 .054
    2012 HOU Royce White F 3 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .000 0.0 -0.121
    2018 PHO Zhaire Smith G
    STARTERS:
    C: Jusuf Nurkic
    C/F: Nikola Vucevic
    F: James Johnson
    G: Nick Young
    G: Terry Rozier
    BENCH: 
    F: Marreese Speights
    F: Luke Babbitt
    C: Bebe Nogueira
    G: Zhaire Smith, I guess?
    Meh. This team is way too big-man heavy and doesn’t have a ton of upside. Vooch/Rozier could be a solid PnR combination, and they would bring a level of toughness to the floor (The Bosnian Bear, Bloodsport, and Scary Terry are not nicknames bestowed upon the undeserving). Overall, the talent level just isn’t high enough to be more than an irritant, especially compared to what’s next. Also, it violates the sacred “Never have more than one Balkan guy on your roster at a time” tenet of NBA team-building.
    Power Rank: 19 (-3)
    TEAM 15:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2011 IND Kawhi Leonard F 427 30.6 16.8 6.3 2.3 1.8 0.7 .494 .385 .847 59.5 .219
    2013 MIL Giannis Antetokounmpo F-G 415 32.8 17.7 7.8 3.9 1.2 1.3 .511 .270 .741 42.7 .151
    2004 BOS Al Jefferson C-F 915 28.7 15.7 8.4 1.5 0.7 1.2 .499 .121 .711 71.0 .130
    2008 PHO Robin Lopez C 710 23.0 8.9 5.3 0.8 0.3 1.2 .527 .222 .760 40.3 .118
    2016 DEN Juan Hernangomez F 110 15.6 5.5 3.3 0.5 0.4 0.2 .455 .399 .770 4.1 .114
    2010 MIL Larry Sanders C-F 238 19.5 6.4 5.7 0.7 0.6 1.8 .480 .000 .553 10.3 .107
    2012 PHI Maurice Harkless F-G 427 22.8 7.2 3.6 0.9 1.0 0.7 .472 .329 .608 16.0 .079
    2018 WAS Troy Brown G-F 12 6.3 2.8 1.6 0.8 0.3 0.0 .414 .400 .875 0.1 .079
    2007 DET Rodney Stuckey G 651 27.5 12.6 2.9 3.6 0.9 0.1 .423 .300 .824 28.7 .077
    2015 ATL Kelly Oubre F 248 20.7 8.1 3.5 0.7 0.7 0.3 .414 .322 .784 6.8 .064
    2009 DET Austin Daye F 293 14.1 5.2 2.6 0.7 0.4 0.4 .402 .351 .778 4.5 .053
    2017 POR Justin Jackson G-F 90 21.8 6.7 2.8 1.2 0.4 0.2 .444 .317 .724 1.8 .043
    2005 NJN Antoine Wright G-F 297 19.2 5.4 2.3 1.0 0.5 0.2 .412 .304 .674 3.1 .026
    2006 NOK Cedric Simmons F 75 9.4 2.2 1.9 0.2 0.1 0.4 .409 .390 0.1 .005
    2014 ATL Adreian Payne F-C 107 13.1 4.0 2.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 .406 .254 .680 -0.6 -0.019
    STARTERS:
    C: Robin Lopez
    F: Al Jefferson
    F: Giannis Antetokounmpo
    G: Kawhi Leonard
    G: Rodney Stuckey
    BENCH:
    F: Mo Harkless
    G: Kelly Oubre
    F: Juancho Hernangomez
    C: Larry Sanders
    Now we’re talking! Sure, I’m fudging the crap out of the positional designations, but whatever. The talent level here is WAY too high for their draft position — Kawhi tumbling to 15 in the 2011 Draft remains inexplicable even without the hindsight of what he’s become — and it would be a blast to watch this team play. The guard situation is obviously not good — having a catch-and-shoot type in Stuckey’s place would be ideal — but the playmaking and scoring will naturally be handled by Kawhi and Giannis anyway. Their spacing would be poor, but Professor Jefferson schooling punks in the post as a third option would be fun, and Lopez is the perfect garbageman for this roster. And did I mention they have Kawhi and Giannis?? It’s going to be a while before we get a combo close to this potent, so be warned. This team is one of our big risers.
    Power Rank: 7 (+8)
    TEAM 14:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2017 MIA Bam Adebayo C-F 92 19.6 7.1 5.9 1.4 0.5 0.7 .519 .000 .715 5.7 .150
    2006 UTA Ronnie Brewer G-F 502 23.0 7.8 2.8 1.6 1.2 0.2 .490 .254 .675 30.4 .127
    2012 MIL John Henson C-F 405 20.1 7.8 5.4 1.1 0.5 1.5 .539 .273 .572 19.3 .114
    2010 HOU Patrick Patterson F 582 22.5 7.2 4.3 1.1 0.6 0.5 .451 .367 .751 28.1 .103
    2004 UTA Kris Humphries F-C 800 17.8 6.7 5.4 0.7 0.4 0.6 .463 .293 .700 30.3 .102
    2014 PHO T.J. Warren F 238 27.2 14.0 4.1 1.1 0.9 0.5 .501 .320 .763 12.2 .090
    2011 HOU Marcus Morris F 492 26.3 11.3 4.5 1.5 0.7 0.2 .431 .362 .737 23.9 .089
    2013 UTA Shabazz Muhammad F-G 278 17.2 9.0 2.8 0.5 0.3 0.1 .473 .319 .751 8.5 .085
    2008 GSW Anthony Randolph F 252 15.2 7.1 4.3 0.7 0.6 0.9 .453 .241 .740 5.8 .072
    2016 CHI Denzel Valentine G 134 22.9 8.0 4.1 2.3 0.7 0.1 .399 .374 .754 3.1 .048
    2015 OKC Cameron Payne G 136 16.0 5.9 1.8 2.5 0.7 0.2 .389 .330 .789 2.0 .043
    2009 PHO Earl Clark F 261 13.9 4.4 3.0 0.5 0.3 0.5 .403 .328 .664 2.9 .038
    2005 MIN Rashad McCants G 249 20.2 10.0 2.0 1.3 0.7 0.2 .431 .368 .741 3.6 .035
    2007 LAC Al Thornton F 296 28.0 11.9 4.2 1.2 0.6 0.5 .452 .293 .747 6.1 .035
    2018 DEN Michael Porter F
    STARTERS:
    C: Bam Adebayo
    F: Marcus Morris
    F: T.J. Warren
    G: Ronnie Brewer
    G: ???
    BENCH:
    F: John Henson
    F: Patrick Patterson
    F: Kris Humphries
    G: Denzel Valentine
    As if to prove my point about what an outlier the previous team was, we get this motley crew of journeymen and busts. There are no true point guards you’d actually want to insert into a game on the roster (sorry not sorry to Cam Payne; he isn’t good), and if T.J. Warren and Marcus Morris are your primary scorers, you’re gonna have a bad time. Just ugly.
    Power Rank: 24 (-10)
    TEAM 13:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2010 TOR Ed Davis F 585 20.4 6.6 6.6 0.8 0.5 0.9 .566 .000 .579 37.3 .150
    2009 IND Tyler Hansbrough F 428 16.9 6.7 4.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 .439 .136 .738 20.2 .134
    2013 DAL Kelly Olynyk C-F 376 21.2 9.8 4.9 1.9 0.7 0.5 .480 .371 .751 21.4 .129
    2006 PHI Thabo Sefolosha G-F 789 23.0 6.0 3.9 1.5 1.1 0.4 .449 .346 .738 37.3 .099
    2018 LAC Jerome Robinson G 8 5.0 2.9 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 .500 .556 0.1 .098
    2017 DEN Donovan Mitchell G 100 33.2 20.6 3.6 3.7 1.5 0.3 .435 .331 .805 5.9 .085
    2011 PHO Markieff Morris F 545 26.4 11.9 5.6 1.7 0.9 0.6 .451 .339 .780 23.0 .077
    2005 CHA Sean May F 119 15.7 6.9 4.0 1.0 0.4 0.4 .458 .231 .746 2.6 .068
    2007 NOK Julian Wright F 231 13.2 3.9 2.3 0.8 0.6 0.3 .499 .262 .584 3.9 .061
    2008 POR Brandon Rush G-F 481 22.0 6.8 2.9 1.0 0.5 0.5 .426 .402 .706 11.2 .051
    2016 PHO Georgios Papagiannis C 39 12.2 4.1 3.2 0.7 0.2 0.6 .514 .000 .857 0.4 .044
    2015 PHO Devin Booker G 227 32.5 20.1 3.3 3.7 0.8 0.3 .427 .358 .848 6.6 .043
    2014 MIN Zach LaVine G 254 29.4 15.0 3.2 3.4 0.8 0.2 .437 .365 .830 5.8 .037
    2004 POR Sebastian Telfair G 564 21.5 7.4 1.6 3.5 0.7 0.1 .390 .319 .777 5.0 .020
    2012 PHO Kendall Marshall G 160 19.3 5.0 1.6 4.9 0.7 0.1 .399 .370 .611 1.0 .015
    STARTERS:
    C: Kelly Olynyk
    F: Markieff Morris
    G: Devin Booker
    G: Zach LaVine
    G: Donovan Mitchell
    BENCH:
    F: Ed Davis
    F: Thabo Sefolosha
    G/F: Brandon Rush
    G: Bassy Telfair
    F: Tyler Hansbrough
    The “There’s Only One Ball” All-Stars. This team would shoot a metric shit-ton of threes, Ed Davis would set an NBA record for offensive rebounding rate, and Sefolosha would go insane trying to get everyone else to play a lick of defense. They would be a fake League Pass delight, and people who don’t know better would be super confused at season’s end about why they weren’t better.
    Power Rank: 14 (-1) 
    TEAM 12:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2013 OKC Steven Adams C 409 25.9 9.1 7.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 .587 .000 .565 32.8 .149
    2018 LAC Miles Bridges G-F 23 20.6 8.0 4.0 1.0 0.7 0.7 .500 .361 .708 1.2 .121
    2012 HOU Jeremy Lamb G-F 380 19.3 9.5 3.4 1.4 0.6 0.3 .445 .340 .843 17.4 .114
    2007 PHI Thaddeus Young F 844 30.7 13.3 5.9 1.6 1.5 0.4 .498 .323 .672 53.9 .100
    2015 UTA Trey Lyles F 248 17.8 7.7 4.0 1.0 0.4 0.3 .437 .349 .699 7.5 .082
    2017 DET Luke Kennard G 78 19.6 7.4 2.3 1.6 0.6 0.2 .441 .404 .855 2.5 .080
    2014 ORL Dario Saric F 183 27.7 13.3 6.4 2.3 0.6 0.3 .427 .351 .827 8.3 .079
    2008 SAC Jason Thompson F-C 588 25.2 8.9 6.6 1.1 0.5 0.7 .496 .143 .657 23.8 .077
    2011 UTA Alec Burks G 386 20.8 9.6 2.9 1.6 0.6 0.2 .424 .351 .770 11.9 .071
    2009 CHA Gerald Henderson G 535 25.9 11.2 3.2 1.9 0.7 0.3 .440 .327 .793 18.3 .063
    2006 NOK Hilton Armstrong F-C 292 11.6 3.0 2.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 .501 .286 .582 3.9 .055
    2004 SEA Robert Swift C 97 15.5 4.3 3.9 0.2 0.3 0.9 .506 .610 1.7 .054
    2016 UTA Taurean Prince F 162 25.0 11.2 3.9 2.0 0.9 0.5 .422 .372 .826 3.2 .038
    2010 MEM Xavier Henry G 185 15.7 5.7 1.9 0.6 0.5 0.1 .406 .325 .635 0.8 .013
    2005 LAC Yaroslav Korolev F 34 4.9 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.0 .283 .250 .625 -0.1 -0.024
    STARTERS:
    C: Steven Adams
    F: Dario Saric
    F: Thaddeus Young
    G: Jeremy Lamb
    G: Gerald Henderson
    BENCH:
    G/F: Miles Bridges
    F: Trey Lyles
    F: Taurean Prince
    C: Jason Thompson
    G: Luke Kennard
    How is a team of no. 12 draft picks not better than this? There’s a ton of competence on this roster, but outside of Steven Adams — AKA my beloved Dothraki son — not much more. They would get some buckets and stops by the power of sheer professionalism, and the bench could have some juice, but it’s kind of a big ‘Meh’ for how high we are in the rankings. Pass.
    Power Rank: 17 (-5)
    TEAM 11:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2010 NOH Cole Aldrich C 339 10.0 3.1 3.3 0.5 0.4 0.7 .527 .738 9.6 .135
    2004 GSW Andris Biedrins C 516 21.6 6.3 7.0 0.9 0.6 1.1 .594 .000 .500 30.7 .132
    2006 ORL J.J. Redick G 786 25.5 12.6 2.0 2.0 0.5 0.1 .449 .413 .892 55.0 .132
    2015 IND Myles Turner C-F 229 27.8 12.6 6.5 1.2 0.6 1.9 .496 .331 .778 17.1 .129
    2011 GSW Klay Thompson G-F 563 33.0 19.4 3.4 2.3 0.9 0.5 .458 .418 .849 42.4 .109
    2012 POR Meyers Leonard C-F 353 15.5 5.5 3.8 0.8 0.2 0.3 .471 .382 .826 11.6 .101
    2016 ORL Domantas Sabonis F-C 178 22.6 9.4 6.1 1.7 0.5 0.4 .492 .342 .734 8.3 .099
    2018 CHO Shai Gilgeous-Alexander G 24 27.6 10.7 3.3 3.0 1.0 0.8 .467 .361 .814 1.1 .080
    2008 IND Jerryd Bayless G 552 21.4 8.5 2.1 2.8 0.6 0.1 .414 .366 .824 18.7 .076
    2014 DEN Doug McDermott F 288 20.4 7.9 2.2 0.8 0.2 0.1 .455 .405 .825 9.1 .074
    2007 ATL Acie Law G 188 12.7 3.9 1.0 1.6 0.4 0.0 .413 .235 .778 1.6 .032
    2013 PHI Michael Carter-Williams G 301 26.6 11.1 4.6 4.7 1.4 0.6 .401 .252 .700 4.3 .026
    2017 CHO Malik Monk G 86 15.1 7.7 1.2 1.6 0.4 0.2 .363 .332 .873 0.2 .007
    2009 NJN Terrence Williams F 153 19.1 7.1 3.6 2.4 0.5 0.1 .412 .317 .659 -0.2 -0.004
    2005 ORL Fran Vazquez
    STARTERS:
    C: Andris Biedrins
    F: Domantas Sabonis
    F: Klay Thompson
    G: JJ Redick
    G: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
    BENCH:
    C: Myles Turner
    F: Doug McDermott
    G: Malik Monk
    G: Jerryd Bayless
    This team would probably be mediocre, but a few interesting notes:
    -Cole Aldrich and Andris Biedrins “leading” the team in WS/48 helps illustrate the potential pitfalls of that particular statistic;
    -Myles Turner and Domantas Sabonis can’t escape each other, even in dumb internet thought exercises;
    -This squad might shoot even more threes than Team 13, and would undoubtedly have less internecine squabbling.
    Power Rank: 13 (-2)
    TEAM 10:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2005 LAL Andrew Bynum C 418 25.6 11.5 7.7 1.2 0.3 1.6 .556 .111 .690 37.4 .168
    2010 IND Paul George F 550 33.4 18.9 6.3 3.2 1.7 0.5 .432 .375 .844 56.5 .147
    2008 NJN Brook Lopez C 659 31.1 17.7 6.7 1.5 0.6 1.7 .500 .341 .789 54.9 .129
    2013 POR CJ McCollum G 365 29.5 17.5 3.0 2.9 0.9 0.3 .455 .405 .841 23.9 .106
    2009 MIL Brandon Jennings G 555 30.3 14.1 3.0 5.7 1.2 0.2 .387 .345 .796 29.9 .085
    2016 MIL Thon Maker F-C 146 13.6 4.5 2.6 0.5 0.3 0.6 .427 .335 .665 3.2 .078
    2007 SAC Spencer Hawes C-F 684 22.7 8.7 5.7 1.9 0.4 1.0 .457 .350 .716 22.6 .070
    2014 PHI Elfrid Payton G 306 29.4 11.1 4.3 6.4 1.3 0.3 .457 .301 .620 12.0 .064
    2017 SAC Zach Collins C-F 90 16.7 5.3 3.6 0.8 0.3 0.6 .434 .318 .753 1.6 .053
    2006 SEA Mouhamed Sene C-F 47 5.5 2.2 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.5 .427 .589 0.3 .052
    2015 MIA Justise Winslow F 183 27.7 7.7 5.3 2.1 0.9 0.4 .404 .318 .659 5.1 .048
    2011 MIL Jimmer Fredette G 235 13.4 6.0 1.0 1.4 0.4 0.0 .412 .381 .876 2.4 .037
    2012 NOH Austin Rivers G 433 24.2 9.3 2.0 2.4 0.7 0.2 .418 .351 .648 7.6 .035
    2018 PHI Mikal Bridges G 24 22.0 6.8 2.1 1.1 1.4 0.3 .413 .307 .846 0.3 .029
    2004 CLE Luke Jackson F 73 9.9 3.5 1.2 0.8 0.3 0.0 .357 .360 .732 0.2 .010
    STARTERS:
    C: Andrew Bynum
    F: Brook Lopez
    F: Paul George
    G: CJ McCollum
    G: Brandon Jennings
    BENCH:
    C: Zach Collins
    G: Elfrid Payton
    F: Justise Winslow
    G/F: Mikal Bridges
    G: Austin Rivers
    C/F: Spencer Hawes
    Deep, versatile, and talented. This team would make it tough for those above them in the pecking order. Their point guard rotation is troublesome, and the bigs would have a difficult time guarding in space, but a Bynum/George/McCollum top three is intriguing. If nothing else, they would score in bunches.
    Power Rank: 8 (+2)
    TEAM 9:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2016 TOR Jakob Poeltl C 157 15.4 5.4 4.1 0.6 0.4 0.8 .643 .500 .588 8.3 .165
    2007 CHI Joakim Noah C 626 28.6 8.9 9.3 2.9 0.8 1.3 .490 .000 .699 59.6 .160
    2012 DET Andre Drummond C 485 30.5 13.8 13.5 1.1 1.3 1.5 .543 .167 .424 48.5 .158
    2010 UTA Gordon Hayward F-G 538 31.1 15.5 4.2 3.4 1.0 0.4 .443 .366 .822 44.7 .128
    2004 PHI Andre Iguodala G-F 1064 33.8 12.4 5.1 4.4 1.5 0.5 .464 .333 .712 93.0 .124
    2009 TOR DeMar DeRozan G-F 700 34.1 19.9 4.1 3.2 1.0 0.3 .449 .285 .829 56.0 .113
    2011 CHA Kemba Walker G 547 34.0 19.3 3.8 5.4 1.3 0.4 .416 .358 .832 43.9 .113
    2005 GSW Ike Diogu F 225 12.4 6.0 3.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 .509 .500 .786 6.5 .112
    2008 CHA D.J. Augustin G 751 23.7 9.6 1.8 3.9 0.6 0.0 .408 .379 .863 37.0 .100
    2015 CHO Frank Kaminsky F-C 248 22.8 9.8 4.0 1.6 0.5 0.4 .414 .347 .764 9.5 .081
    2014 CHH Noah Vonleh F 256 16.4 4.6 5.0 0.5 0.4 0.4 .452 .333 .679 6.7 .077
    2013 MIN Trey Burke G 324 24.2 10.9 2.1 3.7 0.6 0.1 .405 .340 .792 9.0 .055
    2006 GSW Patrick O’Bryant C 90 5.8 2.1 1.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 .494 .000 .583 0.5 .046
    2018 NYK Kevin Knox F 18 19.6 8.6 3.2 0.8 0.5 0.4 .338 .328 .667 -0.3 -0.043
    2017 DAL Dennis Smith G 89 29.4 14.8 3.6 5.0 1.1 0.3 .403 .321 .688 -0.5 -0.009
    STARTERS:
    C: Joakim Noah
    F: Gordon Hayward
    F: Andre Iguodala
    G: DeMar DeRozan
    G: Kemba Walker
    BENCH:
    C: Andre Drummond
    G: D.J. Augustin
    C: Jakob Poeltl
    F: Frank Kaminsky
    F: Noah Vonleh
    G: Trey Burke
    Projects: Kevin Knox and Dennis Smith, Jr.
    Shots fired! This team wouldn’t space the floor all that well, but athletically it would be a MONSTER. I had to legitimately stop and think about whether Noah or Drummond would start at center, but ’13-’14 Noah was DPOY/1st Team All-Defense/4th in MVP voting, and having yet another playmaker on the floor would make this offense unguardable, so he gets the nod. The depth of playmaking and basketball IQ are remarkable here, and they could easily stagger the minutes of the star wings to keep bench units humming. I REALLY like this team.
    Power Rank: 5 (+4)
    TEAM 8:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2007 CHA Brandan Wright F-C 428 16.2 7.0 3.6 0.5 0.5 1.0 .607 .000 .674 26.2 .181
    2009 NYK Jordan Hill C-F 409 18.8 7.9 5.8 0.8 0.4 0.7 .497 .136 .699 16.4 .102
    2005 NYK Channing Frye C-F 860 22.6 8.9 4.6 1.0 0.5 0.6 .442 .388 .823 38.8 .096
    2006 HOU Rudy Gay F 831 34.4 17.8 5.9 2.2 1.3 0.8 .454 .347 .795 51.7 .087
    2013 DET Kentavious Caldwell-Pope G 412 30.2 11.8 3.4 1.6 1.2 0.2 .408 .344 .794 20.7 .080
    2010 LAC Al-Farouq Aminu F 613 25.0 7.6 6.0 1.2 1.0 0.6 .422 .337 .732 23.2 .073
    2012 TOR Terrence Ross F-G 436 23.9 9.9 2.7 1.0 0.8 0.3 .424 .373 .803 15.9 .073
    2011 DET Brandon Knight G 382 31.3 15.2 3.3 4.3 0.9 0.2 .415 .357 .812 11.6 .047
    2016 SAC Marquese Chriss F 163 20.4 8.1 4.6 0.9 0.7 0.9 .437 .305 .617 2.4 .035
    2008 MIL Joe Alexander F 67 11.1 4.2 1.8 0.7 0.2 0.4 .410 .340 .698 0.5 .030
    2015 DET Stanley Johnson F 240 22.7 7.2 3.5 1.5 1.0 0.2 .373 .294 .763 3.3 .029
    2014 SAC Nik Stauskas G 291 20.8 7.0 2.1 1.6 0.4 0.3 .389 .352 .809 3.3 .026
    2017 NYK Frank Ntilikina G 101 22.2 5.9 2.2 3.1 0.8 0.3 .357 .300 .762 -1.3 -0.028
    2004 TOR Rafael Araujo C 139 11.4 2.8 2.8 0.3 0.4 0.1 .405 .250 .679 -0.4 -0.013
    2018 CLE Collin Sexton G 24 29.2 14.8 3.2 2.5 0.4 0.1 .444 .462 .891 0.0 -0.001
    STARTERS:
    C: Channing Frye
    F: Al-Farouq Aminu
    F: Rudy Gay
    G: Terrence Ross
    G: Brandon Knight
    BENCH:
    F: Brandan Wright
    C: Jordan Hill
    G: Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
    F: Stanley Johnson
    G: Frank Ntilikina
    Wait, what happened? Is Rudy Gay seriously the best 8th pick of the last fifteen years? How is this possible? I always liked Brandan Wright and thought he got a bum deal, and there’s some decent shooting and young talent here, but what the hell? This squad would get absolutely shit-stomped by Team 9. Weird.
    Power Rank: 18 (-10)
    TEAM 7:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2009 GSW Stephen Curry G 640 34.4 23.3 4.4 6.7 1.8 0.2 .479 .438 .904 95.9 .209
    2010 DET Greg Monroe C-F 600 28.5 13.6 8.5 2.2 1.1 0.6 .515 .000 .706 48.7 .137
    2004 PHO Luol Deng F 883 34.6 15.0 6.1 2.3 1.0 0.5 .455 .331 .770 73.2 .115
    2014 LAL Julius Randle F-C 264 27.7 14.0 8.9 2.6 0.6 0.5 .500 .277 .716 14.1 .093
    2011 SAC Bismack Biyombo C-F 539 20.6 4.9 6.4 0.5 0.3 1.4 .514 .000 .565 21.0 .091
    2018 CHI Wendell Carter C 25 26.0 11.4 7.4 2.2 0.6 1.6 .470 .208 .813 1.2 .091
    2012 GSW Harrison Barnes F 482 30.4 13.3 4.9 1.5 0.7 0.2 .449 .369 .789 27.0 .088
    2005 TOR Charlie Villanueva F 656 20.7 10.4 4.6 0.8 0.5 0.5 .435 .341 .772 22.6 .080
    2008 LAC Eric Gordon G 581 33.2 16.7 2.5 3.0 0.9 0.3 .428 .373 .815 31.1 .077
    2016 DEN Jamal Murray G 187 27.6 13.9 3.3 3.0 0.8 0.3 .430 .354 .891 8.2 .076
    2017 MIN Lauri Markkanen F-C 70 29.7 15.2 7.5 1.1 0.6 0.6 .429 .362 .843 3.2 .073
    2006 BOS Randy Foye G 752 25.6 10.3 2.2 2.8 0.7 0.3 .401 .366 .852 23.5 .058
    2007 MIN Corey Brewer F-G 783 23.3 8.9 2.8 1.5 1.3 0.3 .425 .283 .713 21.5 .057
    2013 SAC Ben McLemore G 356 24.2 8.9 2.5 1.1 0.7 0.2 .416 .351 .782 4.3 .024
    2015 DEN Emmanuel Mudiay G 205 25.0 10.9 3.0 4.1 0.8 0.3 .381 .321 .730 -1.4 -0.013
    STARTERS:
    C: Greg Monroe
    F: Julius Randle
    F: Luol Deng
    G: Jamal Murray
    G: Steph Curry
    BENCH:
    F: Harrison Barnes
    G: Eric Gordon
    F/C: Lauri Markkanen
    C: Wendell Carter
    F: Charlie Villanueva
    F/G: Corey Brewer
    Deeeeep. Team 7 wouldn’t stop anyone, but they wouldn’t have to. They would be able to score from every level of the floor with endless waves of shooting and playmaking, and their bench would be a legit problem for opposing teams. And oh yeah, they also have that Curry guy you may have heard something about. Fake League Pass darlings.
    Power Rank: 6 (+1)
    TEAM 6:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2012 POR Damian Lillard G 493 36.4 23.3 4.1 6.2 0.9 0.3 .432 .367 .885 61.8 .166
    2006 MIN Brandon Roy G 326 35.5 18.8 4.3 4.7 1.0 0.2 .459 .348 .800 37.4 .155
    2008 NYK Danilo Gallinari F 504 31.2 15.5 4.7 2.0 0.8 0.4 .420 .372 .868 45.2 .138
    2018 ORL Mohamed Bamba C 25 16.9 6.7 4.5 1.1 0.3 1.3 .507 .372 .600 1.1 .125
    2004 ATL Josh Childress G-F 391 26.7 9.1 4.7 1.6 0.9 0.5 .522 .329 .779 25.7 .118
    2013 NOH Nerlens Noel C-F 245 24.9 9.0 7.1 1.3 1.5 1.4 .518 .250 .630 14.2 .112
    2015 SAC Willie Cauley-Stein F-C 237 23.3 9.9 5.9 1.4 0.9 0.8 .526 .235 .619 12.1 .105
    2005 POR Martell Webster G-F 580 24.0 8.7 3.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 .418 .382 .791 24.7 .085
    2010 GSW Ekpe Udoh C-F 349 15.6 3.6 2.9 0.7 0.5 1.2 .440 .000 .723 9.0 .080
    2011 WAS Jan Vesely F 162 15.2 3.6 3.5 0.6 0.7 0.5 .521 .000 .408 4.0 .078
    2014 BOS Marcus Smart G 284 28.3 9.2 3.6 3.9 1.5 0.4 .362 .296 .757 12.4 .074
    2016 NOP Buddy Hield G 185 25.0 12.8 3.8 1.8 0.7 0.2 .443 .413 .855 5.2 .054
    2017 ORL Jonathan Isaac F 46 21.2 6.7 4.3 0.8 1.0 1.1 .412 .315 .788 1.1 .052
    2007 MIL Yi Jianlian F 272 22.2 7.9 4.9 0.7 0.5 0.7 .404 .333 .780 3.1 .025
    2009 MIN Jonny Flynn G 163 22.9 9.2 1.9 3.9 0.7 0.0 .400 .338 .809 -1.1 -0.015
    STARTERS:
    C: Willie Cauley-Stein
    F: Danilo Gallinari
    F: Josh Childress
    G: Brandon Roy
    G: Damian Lillard
    BENCH:
    G: Marcus Smart
    G: Buddy Hield
    F: Martell Webster
    C: Mo Bamba
    F: Jonathan Isaac
    I expected a little better here, but the Roy/Lillard backcourt would be nasty. The frontcourt is weak, and the bench will look a lot better three years from now, but c’est la vie. The roster fits together decently well, so maybe the whole would be greater than the sum of the parts, but still kind of disappointing.
    Power Rank: 9 (-3)
    TEAM 5:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2008 MEM Kevin Love F 639 32.2 18.3 11.3 2.3 0.7 0.5 .443 .370 .824 77.1 .180
    2011 TOR Jonas Valanciunas C 466 25.1 11.7 8.4 0.8 0.4 1.0 .559 .375 .788 43.7 .179
    2010 SAC DeMarcus Cousins C-F 535 32.3 21.5 11.0 3.2 1.4 1.2 .460 .338 .737 41.6 .115
    2004 WAS Devin Harris G 930 24.8 11.0 2.2 4.0 1.0 0.2 .434 .327 .797 53.9 .112
    2009 MIN Ricky Rubio G 455 31.2 10.9 4.3 7.8 2.0 0.1 .385 .325 .836 29.3 .099
    2013 PHO Alex Len C 358 19.9 7.4 6.4 0.8 0.4 1.0 .486 .304 .703 12.8 .087
    2006 ATL Shelden Williams F 361 15.5 4.5 4.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 .462 .222 .740 9.9 .085
    2007 BOS Jeff Green F 806 30.1 13.2 4.6 1.6 0.7 0.5 .439 .331 .801 37.5 .074
    2005 CHA Raymond Felton G 951 30.1 11.3 3.0 5.3 1.2 0.2 .412 .327 .789 39.6 .066
    2012 SAC Thomas Robinson F 313 13.4 4.9 4.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 .470 .000 .505 4.6 .053
    2014 UTA Dante Exum G 186 19.7 5.8 1.8 2.2 0.4 0.2 .393 .304 .753 1.8 .024
    2015 ORL Mario Hezonja F-G 242 18.5 7.0 2.8 1.3 0.7 0.3 .414 .324 .815 2.0 .022
    2016 MIN Kris Dunn G 131 22.0 7.6 3.0 3.9 1.4 0.5 .411 .308 .694 0.8 .014
    2017 SAC De’Aaron Fox G 96 28.9 12.9 3.0 5.1 1.1 0.3 .424 .330 .715 0.8 .013
    2018 DAL Trae Young G 25 29.2 15.7 2.8 7.3 0.7 0.3 .377 .239 .784 -0.9 -0.059
    STARTERS:
    C: DeMarcus Cousins
    F: Kevin Love
    F: Jeff Green (can’t believe I’m typing that)
    G: Devin Harris
    G: De’Aaron Fox
    BENCH:
    G: Ricky Rubio
    C: Jonas Valanciunas
    G: Ray Felton, non-fat edition
    F: Thomas Robinson, I guess?
    G: Trae Young
    This team starts out so full of promise. At first glance, you say, “Sweet, Boogie and Love — great start. They’re gonna be dope.” Then, as you peruse the remainder of the roster, your reaction changes to “Wait, whaaaaat?”  The guards are kind of interchangeable; I chose how I did because Harris has had a better career than most realize and was an All-Star that one time (21.3/3.3/6.9 in ’08-’09), and I’m a prisoner of the moment and have really liked what I’ve seen out of Fox so far this season. The wing depth is non-existent, and any semi-regular reader of mine knows I refuse to put any faith in a team relying heavily on Jeff Green. Besides budding star Fox and whatever Trae Young might one day become, this pick has been a weird sinkhole since about 2012, and it drastically lowers the ceiling of our theoretical team.
    Power Rank: 10 (-5)
    TEAM 4:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2005 NOH Chris Paul G 910 35.3 18.7 4.5 9.7 2.2 0.1 .471 .371 .868 166.4 .249
    2008 SEA Russell Westbrook G 763 34.3 23.0 6.7 8.2 1.7 0.3 .436 .308 .811 92.0 .168
    2018 MEM Jaren Jackson F 23 25.5 13.9 4.6 1.3 1.0 2.0 .519 .345 .787 1.9 .156
    2013 CHA Cody Zeller C-F 335 22.6 8.0 5.6 1.3 0.7 0.7 .509 .269 .738 22.0 .140
    2007 MEM Mike Conley G 741 32.6 14.5 2.9 5.7 1.5 0.2 .441 .376 .815 65.8 .131
    2011 CLE Tristan Thompson F-C 543 28.0 9.2 8.6 0.9 0.5 0.7 .519 .000 .608 39.4 .124
    2015 NYK Kristaps Porzingis F-C 186 31.0 17.8 7.1 1.3 0.7 2.0 .437 .361 .804 12.1 .100
    2014 ORL Aaron Gordon F 286 26.6 11.8 6.0 1.8 0.8 0.6 .454 .317 .698 14.6 .092
    2004 LAC Shaun Livingston G 786 21.0 6.4 2.4 3.1 0.7 0.4 .484 .181 .794 28.5 .083
    2006 POR Tyrus Thomas F 402 19.7 7.7 4.8 0.9 0.8 1.3 .438 .235 .732 13.0 .078
    2009 SAC Tyreke Evans G-F 548 31.6 16.2 4.7 5.0 1.3 0.4 .442 .321 .759 28.1 .078
    2010 MIN Wesley Johnson F-G 591 22.5 7.1 3.2 1.1 0.8 0.7 .406 .339 .744 11.1 .040
    2012 CLE Dion Waiters G 365 28.7 13.3 2.7 2.8 1.0 0.3 .412 .341 .701 7.5 .034
    2017 PHO Josh Jackson F-G 101 24.0 12.0 4.2 1.6 1.0 0.5 .414 .261 .634 -1.7 -0.034
    2016 PHO Dragan Bender F 133 20.2 5.2 3.6 1.2 0.2 0.6 .377 .342 .712 -0.3 -0.005
    STARTERS:
    C: Kristaps Porzingis
    F: Jaren Jackson, Jr.
    F: Aaron Gordon
    G: Russell Westbrook
    G: Chris Paul
    BENCH:
    G: Mike Conley
    C: Tristan Thompson
    C: Cody Zeller
    G/F: Tyreke Evans
    G: Shaun Livingston
    There we go. This feels more like the kind of team we should be seeing this close to the end-game. The wing depth is still an issue — besides Team 9, where are all the good wings? — but you can’t argue with those guards, combined with two unicorns in the starting lineup and two more dependable, mistake-free bigs off the bench. This would be a tough team to beat.
    Power Rank: 4 (–)
    TEAM 3:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2009 OKC James Harden G 707 33.9 23.2 5.1 6.1 1.5 0.5 .443 .365 .853 109.5 .219
    2007 ATL Al Horford C-F 739 33.1 14.1 8.5 3.2 0.8 1.2 .523 .367 .749 80.2 .157
    2014 PHI Joel Embiid C 120 29.9 23.0 10.7 3.0 0.7 2.0 .474 .317 .778 11.5 .154
    2011 UTA Enes Kanter C 541 22.2 11.8 7.5 0.8 0.4 0.5 .539 .292 .781 36.3 .145
    2010 NJN Derrick Favors F-C 580 25.9 11.5 7.2 1.1 0.8 1.3 .520 .226 .661 43.6 .139
    2017 BOS Jayson Tatum F 103 30.7 14.4 5.4 1.7 1.0 0.7 .467 .423 .830 9.1 .138
    2013 WAS Otto Porter F 366 26.7 10.6 4.9 1.4 1.2 0.4 .487 .400 .788 27.3 .134
    2005 UTA Deron Williams G 845 34.2 16.3 3.1 8.1 1.0 0.2 .445 .357 .822 77.3 .129
    2012 WAS Bradley Beal G 431 34.0 18.9 3.8 3.4 1.1 0.4 .447 .389 .793 30.6 .100
    2004 CHI Ben Gordon G 744 27.4 14.9 2.5 2.5 0.7 0.2 .432 .401 .857 33.3 .078
    2016 BOS Jaylen Brown F-G 167 24.1 10.4 3.9 1.2 0.7 0.3 .452 .360 .654 6.2 .074
    2018 ATL Luka Doncic G-F 22 32.6 18.1 6.5 4.3 1.0 0.4 .438 .382 .787 1.0 .070
    2008 MIN O.J. Mayo G 547 30.9 13.8 3.1 2.9 1.0 0.3 .429 .373 .820 21.8 .062
    2015 PHI Jahlil Okafor C-F 143 22.0 12.1 5.0 1.0 0.3 0.9 .515 .200 .687 3.1 .047
    2006 CHA Adam Morrison F 161 20.4 7.5 2.1 1.4 0.2 0.1 .373 .331 .710 -1.4 -0.021
    STARTERS:
    C: Joel Embiid
    F: Al Horford
    F: Jayson Tatum
    G: James Harden
    G: Deron Williams
    BENCH:
    G: Bradley Beal
    F: Otto Porter
    G/F: Luka Doncic
    C: Enes Kanter
    G: Ben Gordon
    G/F: Jaylen Brown
    Sweet Jesus, this team COOKS. Five All-Stars, plus at least two more guys (Tatum and Doncic) who will inevitably get there before long. Chicago Ben Gordon was better than you remember, and we used to earnestly debate if Deron Williams was better than Chris Paul. This team is freaking stacked. They would do absolutely everything at an elite level, and no players would ever deserve their “Did Not Dress” designations in the box score more than OJ Mayo, Jah Okafor, and Adam Morrison. They even excel at unintentionally hilarious benchwarmers.
    Power Rank: 1 (+2)
    TEAM 2:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2007 SEA Kevin Durant F-G 797 37.1 27.2 7.1 4.0 1.1 1.1 .491 .382 .884 134.8 .219
    2006 CHI LaMarcus Aldridge F-C 894 34.6 19.4 8.4 1.9 0.7 1.1 .488 .282 .807 98.9 .153
    2004 CHA Emeka Okafor C-F 616 30.9 12.0 9.7 0.8 0.7 1.6 .512 .000 .586 45.3 .114
    2005 ATL Marvin Williams F 962 28.6 10.5 5.3 1.3 0.8 0.5 .444 .360 .806 59.9 .105
    2009 MEM Hasheem Thabeet C 224 10.5 2.2 2.7 0.1 0.3 0.8 .567 .578 4.8 .099
    2012 CHA Michael Kidd-Gilchrist F 375 26.4 9.1 5.9 1.2 0.7 0.7 .478 .255 .708 19.9 .097
    2013 ORL Victor Oladipo G 382 33.3 17.5 4.6 3.9 1.7 0.5 .445 .352 .796 23.2 .088
    2018 SAC Marvin Bagley F 21 24.1 13.0 6.8 0.9 0.5 1.2 .510 .304 .648 0.9 .088
    2011 MIN Derrick Williams F 428 20.7 8.9 4.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 .434 .300 .710 14.1 .076
    2014 MIL Jabari Parker F 208 30.9 15.4 5.7 2.1 0.9 0.4 .486 .338 .743 10.1 .076
    2017 LAL Lonzo Ball G 76 32.2 9.5 6.4 6.4 1.6 0.6 .369 .312 .473 2.8 .055
    2008 MIA Michael Beasley F 592 23.1 12.5 4.8 1.3 0.6 0.5 .465 .352 .761 15.4 .054
    2010 PHI Evan Turner G 636 27.8 10.2 4.8 3.5 0.8 0.3 .434 .297 .782 19.0 .052
    2016 LAL Brandon Ingram F 158 30.8 12.6 4.5 2.8 0.7 0.6 .443 .328 .651 2.9 .028
    2015 LAL D’Angelo Russell G 217 27.9 15.0 3.6 4.5 1.2 0.2 .409 .346 .753 2.5 .020
    STARTERS:
    C: Emeka Okafor
    F: LaMarcus Aldridge
    F: Kevin Durant
    G: Victor Oladipo
    G: Lonzo Ball
    BENCH:
    F: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist
    F: Marvin Williams
    G: Evan Turner
    F: Brandon Ingram
    F: Marvin Bagley
    F Jabari Parker
    Here’s an incredible thought: when you take every no.2 pick for the last 15 years, and cull the very best version of each of those guys, you still get a team which would probably lose to Kevin Durant’s real-life team. Sure, Durant/Aldridge/Oladipo would be a fun top three, and they would be balanced and talented enough to hang in almost every game, but what an underwhelming rest of the roster. They certainly wouldn’t be favored against Team 3, nor against the next group…
    Power Rank: 3 (-1)
    TEAM 1:
    Year Tm Player Pos G MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK FG% 3P% FT% WS WS/48
    2012 NOH Anthony Davis F-C 432 34.9 23.7 10.4 2.0 1.4 2.4 .517 .314 .797 66.8 .213
    2015 MIN Karl-Anthony Towns C-F 271 34.7 21.5 11.7 2.4 0.7 1.5 .538 .391 .840 37.5 .191
    2007 POR Greg Oden C 105 19.3 8.0 6.2 0.5 0.4 1.2 .574 .658 7.3 .174
    2009 LAC Blake Griffin F 551 35.1 21.6 9.2 4.4 0.9 0.5 .506 .331 .686 69.7 .173
    2004 ORL Dwight Howard C 1044 34.5 17.4 12.6 1.5 0.9 2.0 .583 .095 .567 128.9 .172
    2011 CLE Kyrie Irving G 463 33.8 22.0 3.5 5.5 1.3 0.3 .463 .388 .873 52.2 .160
    2016 PHI Ben Simmons G-F 106 33.6 15.7 8.3 8.1 1.6 0.8 .549 .000 .571 11.8 .159
    2018 PHO Deandre Ayton C 24 31.3 16.0 10.2 2.5 0.6 0.8 .600 .000 .783 2.1 .134
    2005 MIL Andrew Bogut C 694 28.4 9.8 8.7 2.2 0.6 1.6 .535 .120 .556 50.3 .122
    2010 WAS John Wall G 565 35.9 19.0 4.3 9.2 1.7 0.7 .433 .326 .781 44.2 .105
    2008 CHI Derrick Rose G 518 33.6 18.9 3.6 5.7 0.8 0.3 .453 .307 .822 36.1 .100
    2006 TOR Andrea Bargnani F-C 550 28.7 14.3 4.6 1.2 0.4 0.9 .439 .354 .824 18.9 .057
    2014 CLE Andrew Wiggins F-G 348 36.0 19.5 4.1 2.1 1.0 0.5 .444 .334 .740 12.5 .048
    2017 PHI Markelle Fultz G 33 20.6 7.7 3.4 3.4 0.9 0.3 .414 .267 .534 0.6 .042
    2013 CLE Anthony Bennett F 151 12.6 4.4 3.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 .392 .261 .670 0.5 .013
    STARTERS:
    C: Dwight Howard
    F: Anthony Davis
    F: Blake Griffin
    G: Derrick Rose
    G: Kyrie Irving
    BENCH:
    F/C: Karl-Anthony Towns
    G: John Wall
    G: Ben Simmons
    C: Andrew Bogut
    C: Deandre Ayton
    At long last, it’s Team Golden Boy. There are some undeniable fit issues here — primarily, the only true wing on the roster is Wiggins, and the odds of him ever taking off his warm-ups are about the same as he and Jimmy Butler starring in a buddy comedy together — but you can’t argue with the talent level. The defensive paint would be an absolute no-fly zone, and depending which vintages you selected, the spacing could be more manageable than it might at first seem. They would also dominate the paint offensively (look at those FG%’s), and there is a near-endless number of devastating pick-and-roll combinations they could deploy. Naturally, LeBron would have been the thing to tie this roster together, but alas, he missed the 2004 cutoff by one season. It would clearly be a nightmare trying to keep this squad away from the rim, but would that interior dominance be enough to counter the balanced roster of Team 3? I say no.
    Power Rank: 2 (-1)
    There you have it. The hypothetical Draft Slot NBA World Champions are the no.3 picks. As if Luka Doncic needed any more accolades this early in his career.
    Hope you enjoyed this exercise, and please feel free to share your feedback on the rankings!
    Photo Credit: NBAE/Getty Images
  • NBA.com

    Grit ‘n’ Grind.

    Lob City.

    If you uttered those phrases to any NBA fan this past summer, two things would have happened: first, he/she would have known exactly what you were talking about; and second, probably expressed some “we hardly knew ye” wistfulness at their demise. The foundational identities of this decade’s Grizzlies and Clippers teams will forever be inextricably linked. Their windows of contention were concurrent (basically, ’11-’12 through ’14-’15). They battled each other in two hard-fought, memorable first-round playoff series (in 2012 and 2013). Both franchises overcame histories of ineptitude to produce compelling, competitive teams who “shot their shot” but ultimately fell short of true greatness, and both rosters were kept together well past their respective expiration dates until things came apart at the seams (whether by design or not) last season. Despite their contrasting styles, they seemed to consistently wind up in the same place: always the bridesmaid, never the bride.

    Memphis made it as far as the Western Finals in ’12-’13 before being dismantled by the Spurs, who were perhaps one of the best non-title teams in NBA history. Their next-best chance was in ’14-’15, where they racked up 55 wins before losing in competitive fashion to eventual-champion Golden State in the West Semis. They got the band back together after that, gritting ‘n’ grinding on the treadmill of mediocrity for two more seasons before the bottom fell out last year, when they finished 22-60 amid a string of injuries, in particular to star point guard Mike Conley. They were rewarded for their fall from grace with the draft pick which became talented big man Jaren Jackson, Jr., but most people (your humble columnist included) assumed they were more likely headed for a rebuild than a rebound.

    While it could be argued Memphis was the victim of hard luck and bad timing, the Lob City Clippers will forever be remembered, first and foremost, for their self-made undoing vs. Houston in the 2015 West Semis. The Clips choked away a 3-2 series lead — including an 18-point cushion late in Game 6 — a collapse from which the group would never truly recover, even if they didn’t realize it at the time. After two more 50+-win seasons (and dispiriting first-round playoff exits), the team traded Chris Paul (at his behest) to Houston during the summer of 2017, then dealt “Clipper for Life” Blake Griffin to Detroit mid-season. The ax fell on Lob City for good in the summer of 2018 when DeAndre Jordan signed with Dallas (for real this time) in free agency. The mish-mash of talent assembled in the trades cobbled together a respectable 42 wins in ’17-’18, but the message was clear: Lob City was dead, and the team would need to chart a new course back to contention.

    This season, as is their custom, the franchises have taken very different paths back to a familiar, albeit somewhat surprising, destination: the thick of the Western Conference playoff race. The Grizzlies have doubled down on their Grit ‘n’ Grind identity, and despite the prevailing headwinds of the league’s current offensive explosion, it has worked to the tune of a 12-8 start, good for sixth in the constantly shifting sands of the West standings. Amid the “position-less” revolution and the whirring, five-out offenses, the Grizz have a decidedly old-school feel: they are allowing the least points per game in the league (102.0), while ranking dead-last in pace (95.0 possessions per 48 minutes) and 26th in 3-point attempts (27.8 per night, though they are 6th in 3P% at 36.6%). A healthy (for now) Mike Conley has helped them climb to 21st in Offensive Rating (up from 27th last year), but the defensive turnaround has undoubtedly been the catalyst of their early success.

    Given the results achieved with this formula throughout most of the decade, it’s a little unfair to call this season’s rebound an outlier (that would probably be last year’s 25th-ranked defense, if we’re being honest), but enough things have had to go right to question whether this start is sustainable.  Two months shy of his 34th birthday, Marc Gasol is having perhaps his best overall season (18.5/9.4/4.0 and shooting 41% from deep on a career-high 4.6 attempts per game) and is back to playing All-NBA caliber defense. Conley — again, still healthy as of this moment — has returned to form, and his quiet, winning consistency and general mastery of the point guard position continue to highlight how baffling-yet-also-not-surprising it is he’s never made an All-Star team. It’s easy to forget after last season’s debacle, but a healthy, productive Gasol/Conley pairing ensures a baseline level of on-court competence. In a massively crowded West field, however, the margin for error (and the level of supporting talent) is thinner than ever. The team has dropped three straight games, the first of which was to the Clippers, so there are some warning signs.

    Last season was undoubtedly rough, but landing Jackson as a result has been a a godsend. His vaunted outside stroke hasn’t entirely followed him from Michigan State (34.9% from three on 43 attempts, so small sample size caveats still apply) while his hacking tendency has (5.7 fouls per 36 minutes, a frightening-but-not-uncommon number for a young big), but on the whole, he’s been as advertised. His mobility, massive wingspan, and shot-blocking ability (3.0 per 36 minutes) inject a level of athleticism Memphis has long lacked, and he should have no problems picking up the slack as the defensive centerpiece if Gasol decides to opt out of his contract and leave in free agency next summer. Offensively, he’s a work in progress, but all the tools of a modern, athletic stretch-5 are there, and it’s hard to complain about getting 18.2 points per 36 minutes, an 18.1 PER, and 51/35/73 shooting splits from a guy who just turned 19 in September. Sky’s the limit.

    Free agent signing Kyle “Slo Mo” Anderson has been a quietly fantastic defender (just as he was in San Antonio), and his floor game remains useful, but it doesn’t look like it’s ever going to happen for him as a scorer. Will they get anything from Chandler Parsons and his papier-mache knees? All available evidence continues to point to an emphatic “no.” Beyond that, is there enough offensive firepower on the roster to stay afloat and allow their stellar defense to take them home? Two of the team’s five leaders in minutes played are Garrett Temple and Shelvin Mack, and as someone who has watched far too many Wizards’ games, that’s…umm…not ideal. Dillon Brooks and JaMychal Green top out as competent role players, and guys like Wayne Selden, MarShon Brooks, and Omri Casspi probably shouldn’t be getting rotation minutes at this point for a team with any kind of aspirations. The whole has certainly been greater than the sum of its parts to this point, and defense will keep them in a lot of games, but cautious optimism is about the most I can muster for a roster with both depth concerns and an injury-prone star.

    All in all, things could be (and have been) a lot worse for the Grizz. The return of Grit ‘n’ Grind has them in position to kick in the door of the West playoffs, and even if they can’t, the top-8 protected first-round pick they owe to Boston (say it with me, kids — thanks Jeff Green!) should convey this summer without causing as much pain down the line as it otherwise could have. Jackson looks like a future star and a tailor-made replacement should franchise icon Gasol leave (or be shown the door) after this season, and perhaps Conley’s gargantuan contract isn’t quite as crippling as it appeared at first blush. Given the future protections on the Boston pick, there is no incentive to tank, and it’s unclear if a team with a healthy Conley in the lineup could do so even if it wanted to, so what we’re seeing is pretty close to the best-case scenario. I remain skeptical it will be enough to continue to hang with the big dogs in the West as the season wears on, but the world is filled with enough playa haters, so I don’t need to be another one.

    Going back to Cali, it’s starting to look less like small sample size theater, and more like something is actually brewing, for the West-leading (!!) Clippers. At 15-6, the new-look Clips have fashioned an identity as something of an anti-Memphis: their democratic, star-less system and tremendous depth have vaulted them to the 6th-ranked offense in the league, powered by a fast pace, accurate shooting, and oodles of free throws. Outside of scorers Danilo Gallinari and Lou Williams, the roster is populated with plus-defenders, propelling them to 10th in Defensive Rating. A top-10 rating on both ends of the floor is usually a good indicator of a borderline elite team, so while twenty games may be a touch soon to make any definitive claims, we’re probably not dealing with a flash in the pan, either.

    Unlike Memphis, LA’s depth is legitimately impressive, and while their top players are all currently healthy, there does not appear to be any one injury which could truly derail them. The 10th-through-15th players on LA’s roster have played a total of 523 combined minutes: Boban Marjanovic, Milos Teodosic, Tyrone Wallace, Luc Mbah a Moute, Sindarius Thornwell, and lottery pick Jerome Robinson. Those are all real NBA players, and they’ve played roughly the same number of combined minutes as Shelvin Mack by himself! There is truly something to be said for filling every available minute of court time with competent, productive players, and this Clippers’ season (along with somewhat similar roster builds in Toronto, Denver, and Milwaukee) is proving it in spades. This may not be exactly the team they meant to construct, but many, many franchises (previous iterations of the Clippers included) have stumbled into far worse.

    The semi-preemptive Chris Paul and Blake Griffin trades turned out to be blessings in disguise. It would be inaccurate to call them “addition by subtraction” moves when we’re talking about two legitimate Hall of Fame-caliber players still producing at a high level (read: this is NOT a Melo scenario). Something real was given up in the trades, but holy hell did the Clips get a lot back, while becoming infinitely more flexible in the process. The team’s top seven players (and 8 of the top 10) in terms of minutes this season were all, directly or indirectly, part of those two trades. Seriously, check it out:

    The CP3 trade netted them:

    -Montrezl Harrell: per-minute monster, Sixth Man of the Year AND Most Improved Player candidate,  super-affordable contract, and the player I foolishly thought Kenneth Faried would be;
    -Lou Williams: ’17-’18 Sixth Man of the Year, super-affordable contract, struggling a bit to start this season but still the team’s primary crunch-time creator;
    -Patrick Beverley: defensive bulldog, super-affordable, expiring, non-guaranteed contract;
    -Houston’s 2018 first-round pick: later included as a sweetener for Atlanta to act as the necessary go-between in the sign-and-trade deal for Danilo Gallinari, currently reminding us what an effective scorer he is when ambulatory.

    Meanwhile, the Griffin trade netted them:

    -Tobias Harris, on his fourth team despite being only 26 and improving every year in the league, leading scorer (21.7 ppg), 53/44/83 shooting splits, expiring contract, and potential All-Star;
    -Boban Marjanovic: freakishly gigantic human, surprisingly effective source of points/rebounds/entertainment when on the court;
    -Avery Bradley: defensive bulldog, currently playing like one of the worst offensive players in the league, meaning regression is coming;
    -Detroit’s 2018 first-round pick: used to select Miles Bridges, who was then flipped to Charlotte for Shai Gilgeous-Alexander who, at age 20, has earned Doc Rivers’ trust (no easy feat), is averaging 28.0 mpg, plays with the poise and control of a seasoned veteran, and looks like a star in the making.

    Nearly as important as the way the on-court pieces from the trade have jelled, however, is the level of flexibility those trades have afforded the Clips’ front office going forward. LA is bumping up against the luxury tax this season (including nearly $7.6 million worth of dead money on their cap), but after this year their cap situation is as pristine as a team could ever want. Five of the players listed above remain under contract beyond this season (Gallo, Williams, Harrell, Bradley, and Gilgeous-Alexander); between them, they will make approximately $53.5 million next season, and the only additional monies owed to them beyond next year are a $1.5 million partial guarantee to Lou Williams for ’20-’21, and the two team options for SGA, which LA will undoubtedly pick up and should represent gigantic bargains, assuming Shai’s current career trajectory holds. Harris is an unrestricted free agent and will be due a hefty raise if LA wants to retain him, but the Clips hold his Bird Rights, so they can offer him a larger contract than other suitors, and it won’t impact their ability to sign another max free agent (cue the Kawhi laughing meme) in any way so long as they time the transactions correctly. It’s a good place to be.

    Contrast this with the amount of money currently owed to Blake and CP3. Beyond this season, the two stars are still guaranteed approximately $234 million combined, including about $83.2 million in ’21-’22 alone, a season during which they will turn 33 and 37, respectively. [Blake has a player option for that season, just FYI, but the money is guaranteed, assuming he opts to take it.] The upside of not paying a massive premium for a player’s decline years — CP3 is already hurt again and is showing some subtle signs of tailing off, bad news for the Rockets — and instead potentially putting that cap space towards a star in his prime is enormous. And the formula of “on-court success plus young, rising stars in the fold plus the cachet of playing in LA” could amount to a pretty compelling pitch to free agents. The democratic approach is working terrifically for them at the moment, but history tells us there is a defined ceiling for this type of team. Keeping the infrastructure in place and adding the right top line star to bring it all together would make this squad really interesting in a hurry.

    While it’s probably unrealistic to expect LA to remain on its current perch atop the West standings for the rest of the year, when I watch this team play, nothing about what they do feels fluky or unsustainable. Perhaps they won’t continue to lap the entire league in free throw rate or opponent’s FG%, but even some regression to the mean in those areas wouldn’t suddenly turn them into the Cavs. The underlying statistics don’t paint their start as being fueled by an easy schedule or abnormally good luck in close games, and the eye test agrees. Their depth and approach mean one injury/suspension/prolonged slump shouldn’t be able to singlehandedly knock them out of their groove, and there’s little risk of opposing teams “figuring them out.” Doc’s strategy of “just keep sending out waves of fresh, consistent, players who fit together” isn’t some gimmick a team can gameplan away.

    Somebody’s gotta die in the overcrowded Western Conference playoff chase, and perhaps it will be one of these teams of whom little was expected coming into the season. If I had to choose one to fall back to the pack, I would pick Memphis, based on their slimmer margin for error (both record- and talent-wise), but it’s certainly possible their stout, on-a-string defense will continue to hypnotize opponents all the way up until the last day of the season. And if you’ve read this far and still aren’t in on the joke, well then…

  • Sports Illustrated

    The NBA season still feels fresh, but the reality is, through Sunday night, 293 total games have been played. This equates to 23.8% of the regular season, meaning we are within a couple days of shooting past the one-quarter mark. Up to this point, it has been easy to dismiss unexpected win-loss records or statistical anomalies as small sample size theater. But the “average” team has now played nearly 1,000 minutes, meaning almost 5,000 total player-minutes. The sample size ain’t that small anymore, sugar-butt.

    With that in mind, it seems like a good time to take stock of where we stand. While there is still much to be sorted out (like the Western Conference, for example), we now possess enough data to confidently state some Things We Know. Let’s do five, in no particular order.

    [All statistics are courtesy of Basketball-Reference.com unless otherwise noted.]

    1. The pace revolution is here to stay. The offensive explosion has regressed to the mean a bit since I first broke it down a few weeks ago, but even so, the trend has solidified itself. Pace, scoring, and efficiency have all continued to spike to a degree which exceeds what we would expect based on a linear progression from previous seasons. The reasons for the spike I discussed previously all hold up over the larger sample size, but what could before have been waved off as a possible blip on the radar now looks like an unmistakable reality. This is what the league is in 2018.

    The teams have had sufficient time to build scouting reports, watch film, make strategic tweaks, and adjust to the “freedom of movement” rule enforcement, so we are likely approaching a sort of homeostasis in the league-wide offensive environment. Scoring is up 4.3 points per game, per team, and pace is up by 2.9 possessions per 48 minutes. Effective FG% is hovering right around last season’s all-time high-water mark (despite a bit of a dip, though not anything out of line historically, in overall 3-point percentage this season), and Offensive Rating is up by 1.1 points per 100 possessions, all while turnover percentage is at an all-time low. Free throw attempts per game are still up from a year ago, but after the early-season parade to the charity stripe, defenses have begun to adapt to their new reality and attempts have dipped back into an era-appropriate range.

    “It’s hard, it’s harder. The game is evolving…It sells more tickets…It’s on us to be smart and try to adapt,” said Utah Jazz center (and reigning Defensive Player of the Year) Rudy Gobert, summing up the challenges of defending in this brave, new offensive world. Utah — who has dropped to 11th in Defensive Rating after leading the league last season and is currently second-to-last in the West standings — and the rest of the league are still adapting, but the quote tells you everything you need to know. This is the new paradigm; learn to operate within it or get left behind.

    2. The Western Conference is a clusterf*ck. The aforementioned Jazz are sitting at 14th in the West, but are only one game behind Sacramento in eighth. Portland has lost its last three games and dropped from first to sixth. I wrote in the preseason about how the West had more good teams than playoff spots, but I had no idea how right I was. Sacramento and Dallas have emerged from the depths to provide young, exciting night-to-night competition. Memphis and the Clippers have ridden good health and their inner Ubuntu towards the top of the standings — I’ll have more on them in the coming days — leaving Phoenix as the only team in the West without legitimate playoff aspirations. Balance of power between the conferences has long been an issue in the NBA, but fourteen teams for eight spots? Pure insanity.

    While the East has quickly stratified itself, the West is likely to remain a dogfight (plus Phoenix) for most of the year. Even if conventional wisdom holds and the biggest underachievers thus far, Houston and Utah, begin to climb up the standings towards their preseason expectations — Houston has won five of its last seven — while the Mavs, Kings, and Wolves fade down the stretch, there will still be a mad scramble for the final few playoff spots. We may not know how it’s going to shake out yet, but it will be fascinating to watch, and the ramifications going forward could be huge (see next item).

    USA Today

    3. New Orleans needs to make a trade. It would be hard to dream up a franchise more ripe for a deal. The Pels are sitting at .500, tied for 8th in the West, but they have a number of fundamental issues to solve if they are going to stay in the playoff mix all season. The defense has taken a giant step backward (24th in Defensive Rating after ranking 14th last season). The small forward position remains a festering wound. [When Wesley Johnson represents a significant upgrade, you know you’re in a bad place.] Julius Randle and Nikola Mirotic play the same position and basically can’t share the floor during crunch time, which is a problem since they are two of the team’s four best players. In a vacuum, they have a lot of good pieces, but as constructed, the lineups just don’t really fit. Hanging over everything is Anthony Davis’ ability to opt out of his contract after next season and/or exercise his pre-agency by demanding a trade if he doesn’t feel the organization is doing enough to help him propel the team into contention. Something has got to give.

    Finding a workable deal will be thorny, however. Randle is an obvious candidate to be moved, and he would certainly draw interest from a number of teams, though his below-market deal includes a player option after this year, which could dampen the enthusiasm of a team looking to retain him long-term. Solomon Hill’s contract figure would be exceptionally tradeable, if only he had any on-court value whatsoever. He started logging DNP-CD’s as soon as Johnson hit the rotation, and no one is going to be lining up to pay him $13.3 million next season to wave a towel. Thanks again, summer of 2016!

    New Orleans has been linked to all three of Washington’s suddenly-available stars (Bradley Beal, John Wall, and Otto Porter). Of the three, Porter seems the most logical in terms of the assets it would take to acquire him and the need he would fill. If I were Pelicans’ GM Dell Demps, I would also be in touch with Phoenix about the potential availability of wings like Trevor Ariza, TJ Warren, or Josh Jackson, and I would throw my hat in the ring on the forthcoming trade and/or buyout of Kent Bazemore from Atlanta. None of these moves represents a home run, nor would they ensure Davis’ continued commitment to the franchise, but the Pels have to do something. Taking on long-term money without any guarantees from AD is obviously far from ideal, but they are screwed no matter what if he leaves, so who really cares if the darkest timeline turns out to be a bit darker?

    4. Charlotte is actually kind of good but can’t close games. This probably deserves its own column, but I’ll just mention it here quickly because it’s become a real thing. Charlotte is 9-10, currently 8th in the East. However, they have the point differential (+4.5, sixth best in the NBA) of a 12-7 team. Seven of their nine wins have been by double digits, and eight of their ten losses have been by five points or less. They have played a relatively easy schedule, but even taking that into consideration, Simple Rating System (SRS) still pegs the Hornets as the eighth-best team in the NBA.

    It would be easy to dismiss this season’s crunch time struggles as small sample size nonsense, but there’s more to the story. Since the beginning of the ’16-’17 season, Charlotte is 2-20 in games decided by three points or less, and 23-41 in games where the margin has been within three points any time in the final minute. They moved on from head coach Steve Clifford (replacing him with long-time Spurs’ assistant James Borrego this past offseason) and rid themselves of the Dwightbola virus, yet their “clutch” problem remains. What gives?

    The problem is particularly vexing because Kemba Walker, ever since his magical tournament run during his UConn days, has always been thought of as a crunch time assassin. But does the NBA version of Kemba deserve this distinction? Walker is certainly doing his poor man’s Steph Curry impression (27.9/4.3/6.5, 38.5% from three on 9.8 attempts per game) to a T, and garnering some MVP buzz — pun very much intended — in the process, but is he the clutch killer his reputation would suggest? Not exactly, though he hasn’t been terrible either. Excluding one desperation heave, Kemba is shooting 14/36 (38.9%) from the field with three turnovers in the last three minutes of the 4th quarter and any part of overtime when the margin is within 5 points — a rough approximation of “crunch time” for our purposes. Shooting percentages generally dip a bit in these scenarios as players tire and isolations become more prevalent, so his numbers aren’t particularly poor. The team as a whole is shooting 38.6% in these scenarios — again, not great but not atrocious either — so it’s tough to assign much credit or blame either way. It’s possible having a small-ish guard as the primary creator in these situations ratchets up the degree of difficulty (an offshoot of my “beavers” theory of playmaking), but the numbers don’t entirely bear it out.

    The root cause may not be entirely clear, but we do know the Hornets are better than their record indicates, and they have the potential to put together a real playoff run if they can just figure out how to finish games.

    [Note: Charlotte did in fact close out a crunch time game immediately after this was written, beating Milwaukee 110-107 on Monday night, despite nearly squandering a 25-point lead late in the 3rd quarter. The moral of the story, as always: I’m an idiot.]

    5. Luka Doncic is the real deal. When one searches Basketball-Reference’s Season Finder for rookies who averaged 19 ppg/6 rpg/4 apg, here is what emerges:

    Look at those names, and more importantly, look at how old they were when they compiled those numbers! If you add 3P% as an additional criteria, the list whittles down to Luka and Larry Legend. That’s it.

    [Note: Yes, LeBron clearly belongs on this list in a historical sense, but he “only” averaged 5.5 rebounds per game his rookie year, so he doesn’t quite fit the criteria. Overall, Bron had a slightly superior statistical profile at the same age, but it’s splitting hairs. Counting stats can be arbitrary while simultaneously painting a useful picture.]

    Doncic still has some warts as a player, but he’s already in rare company, AND HE’S ONLY 19! We’re witnessing the genesis of a special, special player. He isn’t an athletic super-freak like LeBron, MJ, Kareem, or Elgin, but he already sports the advanced playmaking chops and “basketball genius” instincts only seen in the true greats. And did I mention he’s only 19?

    Look, I’m not saying Luka is Larry Bird. BUT….Larry Legend was four years older when he put up those (admittedly superior) stats as a rookie. Anyone who made the comparison pre-draft basically got shouted down as a blasphemer, but having seen Doncic play against real, live, NBA competition, the similarities are pretty striking: the effortless deep range, the surprising size and strength, the fully-developed bag of offensive tricks, the genius-level passing, the remarkably mature ability to manipulate time, space, and pace — it’s all there.

    Luka will probably never rebound at the level Bird did (he’s just not as big and he plays further from the basket), but in his age-26 season (’82-’83), Larry averaged 23.6 ppg and 5.8 apg while only attempting one three-pointer per game. Is there anything to suggest Doncic won’t be at least that productive as he enters his prime seven years from now? So long as he stays healthy, as his body matures and he improves his conditioning, there is just no telling how good he could be. [Feel free to pour one out for all the Hawks’ fans who are quietly sobbing as they read this.]

    Sure, it’s not all puppies and candy. His defense is pretty lousy — fortunately, “HE’S ONLY 19” works just as well to excuse his faults as it does to sing his praises — and he and Dennis Smith, Jr. have not fit together at all (Doncic has a -5.5 net rating with Smith on the floor and a +10.3 without him), but that problem belongs more to Smith and the Mavs’ front office than it does to Doncic. Even with questions looming about how the organization will build around him, things still look pretty rosy. The team has won seven of its last nine games and sits at .500, tied for 8th in the West in what, by all accounts, was supposed to be a rebuilding year. It’s almost as if acquiring a generational talent dramatically improves a team’s outlook. Who knew?